Literature DB >> 31127429

Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study.

Marcel Reymus1, Rosalie Fabritius2, Andreas Keßler3, Reinhard Hickel3, Daniel Edelhoff2, Bogna Stawarczyk2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of 3D print material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging on fracture load of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-unit FDPs were 3D-printed using experimental resin (EXP), NextDent C&B (CB), Freeprint temp (FT), and 3Delta temp (DT). In the first part, the impacts of build direction and artificial aging were tested. FDPs were manufactured with their long-axis positioned either occlusal, buccal, or distal to the printer's platform. Fracture load was measured after artificial aging (H2O: 21 days, 37 °C). In the second part, the impact of post-curing was tested. FDPs were post-cured using Labolight DUO, Otoflash G171, and LC-3DPrint Box. While the positive control group was milled from TelioCAD (TC), the negative control group was fabricated from a conventional interim material Luxatemp (LT). The measured initial fracture loads were compared with those after artificial aging. Each subgroup contained 15 specimens. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffé post hoc test, t test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). The univariate ANOVA with partial eta squared (ηP2) was used to analyze the impact of test parameters on fracture load.
RESULTS: Specimens manufactured with their long-axis positioned distal to the printer's platform showed higher fracture load than occlusal ones (p = 0.049). The highest values were observed for CB, followed by DT (p < 0.001). EXP showed the lowest values, followed by FT (p < 0.001). After artificial aging, a decrease of fracture load for EXP (p < 0.001) and DT (p < 0.001) was observed. The highest impact on values was exerted by interactions between 3D print material and post-curing unit (ηP2 = 0.233, p < 0.001), followed by the 3D print material (ηP2 = 0.219, p < 0.001) and curing device (ηP2 = 0.108, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Build direction, post-curing, artificial aging, and material have an impact on the mechanical stability of printed FDPs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The correct post-curing strategy is mandatory to ensure mechanical stability of 3D-printed FDPs. Additively manufactured FDPs are more prone to artificial aging than conventionally fabricated ones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Artificial aging; Build direction; Fracture load; Post-curing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31127429     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02952-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  22 in total

1.  Guided Endodontics: a novel treatment approach for teeth with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology.

Authors:  Gabriel Krastl; Marc S Zehnder; Thomas Connert; Roland Weiger; Sebastian Kühl
Journal:  Dent Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations.

Authors:  Nawal Alharbi; Reham Osman; Daniel Wismeijer
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities.

Authors:  Joerg R Strub; E Dianne Rekow; Siegbert Witkowski
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 4.  A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Takashi Miyazaki; Yasuhiro Hotta; Jun Kunii; Soichi Kuriyama; Yukimichi Tamaki
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.

Authors:  Aletta Hazeveld; James J R Huddleston Slater; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  The influence of support properties and complexity on fracture strength and fracture mode of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Deyar Jallal Hadi Mahmood; Ewa H Linderoth; Per Vult Von Steyern
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Mika Salmi; Kaija-Stiina Paloheimo; Jukka Tuomi; Tuula Ingman; Antti Mäkitie
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A comparison between customized clear and removable orthodontic appliances manufactured using RP and CNC techniques.

Authors:  Massimo Martorelli; Salvatore Gerbino; Michele Giudice; Pietro Ausiello
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.

Authors:  Zhuoli Huang; Lu Zhang; Jingwei Zhu; Xiuyin Zhang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Maximal bite force and its association with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish non-patients.

Authors:  A Waltimo; M Könönen
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.331

View more
  11 in total

1.  Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material.

Authors:  Johannes Mayer; Bogna Stawarczyk; Konstantin Vogt; Reinhard Hickel; Daniel Edelhoff; Marcel Reymus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh Jain; Mohammed E Sayed; Mallika Shetty; Saeed M Alqahtani; Mohammed Hussain Dafer Al Wadei; Shilpi Gilra Gupta; Ahlam Abdulsalam Ahmed Othman; Abdulkarim Hussain Alshehri; Hatem Alqarni; Abdulaziz Hussain Mobarki; Khalid Motlaq; Haifa F Bakmani; Asma A Zain; Abdullah J Hakami; Moayad F Sheayria
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Compressive and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed and Conventional Resins Designated for Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Comparison.

Authors:  Mihaela Pantea; Robert Cătălin Ciocoiu; Maria Greabu; Alexandra Ripszky Totan; Marina Imre; Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu; Ruxandra Sfeatcu; Tudor Claudiu Spînu; Radu Ilinca; Alexandru Eugen Petre
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Effect of occlusal coverage depths on the precision of 3D-printed orthognathic surgical splints.

Authors:  Yipeng Wang; Peiqi Wang; Xiang Xiang; Hui Xu; Yuting Tang; Yumeng Zhou; Ding Bai; Chaoran Xue
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 5.  3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alvaro Della Bona; Viviane Cantelli; Vitor T Britto; Kaue F Collares; Jeffrey W Stansbury
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Accuracy of CAD/CAM-fabricated bite splints: milling vs 3D printing.

Authors:  Reymus Marcel; Hickel Reinhard; Keßler Andreas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Does Printing Orientation Matter? In-Vitro Fracture Strength of Temporary Fixed Dental Prostheses after a 1-Year Simulation in the Artificial Mouth.

Authors:  Julian Nold; Christian Wesemann; Laura Rieg; Lara Binder; Siegbert Witkowski; Benedikt Christopher Spies; Ralf Joachim Kohal
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques.

Authors:  Amal S Al-Qahtani; Huda I Tulbah; Mashael Binhasan; Maria S Abbasi; Naseer Ahmed; Sara Shabib; Imran Farooq; Nada Aldahian; Sidra S Nisar; Syeda A Tanveer; Fahim Vohra; Tariq Abduljabbar
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Effect of Printing Layer Thickness and Postprinting Conditions on the Flexural Strength and Hardness of a 3D-Printed Resin.

Authors:  Abdullah A Alshamrani; Raju Raju; Ayman Ellakwa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Two-body wear of occlusal splint materials from subtractive computer-aided manufacturing and three-dimensional printing.

Authors:  Felix Schmeiser; Uwe Baumert; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.