Literature DB >> 26803175

Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations.

Nawal Alharbi1, Reham Osman2, Daniel Wismeijer3.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The application of 3-dimensional printing technology is emerging in dentistry and is being increasingly used to fabricate dental restorations. To date, scientific evidence is lacking regarding the effect of different factors on the mechanical properties of the printed restorations with the additive manufacturing technique.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build direction (layer orientation) on the mechanical properties of a novel 3-dimensionally (3D)-printed dental restorative material.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on the printing direction, 2 groups were tested. In the first group (n=20), the specimens were vertically printed with the layers oriented perpendicular to the load direction. In the second group (n=20), the specimens were horizontally printed with the layers oriented parallel to the load direction. All specimens were fabricated using the DW028D 3D-printer. The specimens were loaded with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min with a 10-kN load cell. The test was performed at room temperature (22°C) under dry testing conditions. The compressive strength was calculated for both groups, and the results were compared using the unpaired t test (α=.05).
RESULTS: The mean ±SD compressive strength for the vertically printed specimens was 297 MPa (±34) compared with 257 MPa (±41) for the horizontally printed specimens (P=.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the layer orientation was found to influence the compressive strength of the material. Vertically printed specimens with the layers oriented perpendicular to load direction have improved mechanical properties more than horizontally printed specimens with the layers oriented parallel to load direction.
Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26803175     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  27 in total

1.  Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Marcel Reymus; Rosalie Fabritius; Andreas Keßler; Reinhard Hickel; Daniel Edelhoff; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material.

Authors:  Johannes Mayer; Bogna Stawarczyk; Konstantin Vogt; Reinhard Hickel; Daniel Edelhoff; Marcel Reymus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh Jain; Mohammed E Sayed; Mallika Shetty; Saeed M Alqahtani; Mohammed Hussain Dafer Al Wadei; Shilpi Gilra Gupta; Ahlam Abdulsalam Ahmed Othman; Abdulkarim Hussain Alshehri; Hatem Alqarni; Abdulaziz Hussain Mobarki; Khalid Motlaq; Haifa F Bakmani; Asma A Zain; Abdullah J Hakami; Moayad F Sheayria
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials.

Authors:  Anthony Tahayeri; MaryCatherine Morgan; Ana P Fugolin; Despoina Bompolaki; Avathamsa Athirasala; Carmem S Pfeifer; Jack L Ferracane; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 5.  3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alvaro Della Bona; Viviane Cantelli; Vitor T Britto; Kaue F Collares; Jeffrey W Stansbury
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system.

Authors:  Wan-Sun Lee; Du-Hyeong Lee; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 7.  A Review on the Biocompatibility of PMMA-Based Dental Materials for Interim Prosthetic Restorations with a Glimpse into their Modern Manufacturing Techniques.

Authors:  Silviu Mirel Pituru; Maria Greabu; Alexandra Totan; Marina Imre; Mihaela Pantea; Tudor Spinu; Ana Maria Cristina Tancu; Nicoleta Olivia Popoviciu; Iulia-Ioana Stanescu; Ecaterina Ionescu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Comparing accuracy of denture bases fabricated by injection molding, CAD/CAM milling, and rapid prototyping method.

Authors:  Suji Lee; Seoung-Jin Hong; Janghyun Paek; Ahran Pae; Kung-Rock Kwon; Kwantae Noh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies.

Authors:  Faruk Emir; Gulsum Ceylan; Simel Ayyildiz
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2021-05-04

Review 10.  3D printed complete removable dental prostheses: a narrative review.

Authors:  Eva Anadioti; Leen Musharbash; Markus B Blatz; George Papavasiliou; Phophi Kamposiora
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.