Literature DB >> 31067954

Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Michael E Ravicz1, Jeffrey Tao Cheng1, John J Rosowski1.   

Abstract

This work is part of a study of the interactions of ear canal (EC) sound with tympanic membrane (TM) surface displacements. In human temporal bones, the ossicles were stimulated mechanically "in reverse" to mimic otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), and the sound field within the ear canal was sampled with 0.5-2 mm spacing near the TM surface and at more distal locations within the EC, including along the longitudinal EC axis. Sound fields were measured with the EC open or occluded. The reverse-driven sound field near the TM had larger and more irregular spatial variations below 10 kHz than with forward sound stimulation, consistent with a significant contribution of nonuniform sound modes. These variations generally did not propagate more than ∼4 mm laterally from the TM. Longitudinal sound field variations with the EC open or blocked were consistent with standing-wave patterns in tubes with open or closed ends. Relative contributions of the nonuniform components to the total sound pressure near the TM were largest at EC natural frequencies where the longitudinal component was small. Transverse variations in EC sound pressure can be reduced by reducing longitudinal EC sound pressure variations, e.g., via reducing reflections from occluding earplugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31067954      PMCID: PMC6435373          DOI: 10.1121/1.5094776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Acoustic responses of the human middle ear.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Acoustic intensity, impedance and reflection coefficient in the human ear canal.

Authors:  B L Farmer-Fedor; R D Rabbitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of an analytic horn equation approach and a boundary element method for the calculation of sound fields in the human ear canal.

Authors:  Michael R Stinson; Gilles A Daigle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustics of the human middle-ear air space.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Susan E Voss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic impedance measurements-correction for probe geometry mismatch.

Authors:  N H Fletcher; J Smith; A Z Tarnopolsky; J Wolfe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ear canal cross-sectional pressure distributions: mathematical analysis and computation.

Authors:  R D Rabbitt; M T Friedrich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans.

Authors:  L E Dreisbach; J H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.