Literature DB >> 11757935

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans.

L E Dreisbach1, J H Siegel.   

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) elicited with stimulus frequencies less than or equal to 8 kHz have been used in hearing clinics to assess whether the middle ear and cochlea are normal, but high-frequency hearing (>4 kHz) is most vulnerable to cochlear pathology. It might prove useful to measure DPOAEs with even higher frequency stimuli (>8 kHz), but there have been few reports of such studies in humans. DPOAEs have been measured in other mammals to the upper range of hearing sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to compare some characteristics of DPOAEs in human subjects elicited with high-frequency stimuli with those that have been extensively measured with lower-frequency stimuli. The primary goal was to establish if the same phenomenon responsible for the behavior of low-frequency DPOAEs is responsible for the behavior of high-frequency DPOAEs. Specifically, the DPOAE level with stimuli varied from 2 to 20 kHz, growth functions of DPOAEs, effects of varying the primary frequency ratio (f2/f1) on the DPOAE level, and DPOAE group delay were determined. Because the behaviors appeared to vary smoothly with stimulus frequency, the study suggests that emissions measured from 2 to 20 kHz were the product of the same biological process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11757935     DOI: 10.1121/1.1406497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.

Authors:  Abigail R Rogers; Sienna R Burke; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.

Authors:  Sienna R Burke; Abigail R Rogers; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions measured as vibration on the eardrum of human subjects.

Authors:  E Dalhoff; D Turcanu; H-P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Do "optimal" conditions improve distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance?

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Andrea Pittman; James Lewis; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.