Literature DB >> 16266162

Comparison of an analytic horn equation approach and a boundary element method for the calculation of sound fields in the human ear canal.

Michael R Stinson1, Gilles A Daigle.   

Abstract

The sound field inside a model human ear canal has been computed, to show both longitudinal variations along the canal length and transverse variations through cross-sectional slices. Two methods of computation were used. A modified horn equation approach parametrizes the sound field with a single coordinate, the position along a curved center axis-this approach can accommodate the curvature and varying cross-sectional area of the ear canal but cannot compute transverse variations of the sound field. A boundary element method (BEM) was also implemented to compute the full three-dimensional sound field. Over 2000 triangular mesh elements were used to represent the ear canal geometry. For a plane piston source at the entrance plane, the pressure along the curved center axis predicted by the two methods is in good agreement, for frequencies up to 15 kHz, for four different ear canals. The BEM approach, though, reveals spatial variations of sound pressure within each canal cross section. These variations are small below 4 kHz, but increase with frequency, reaching 1.5 dB at 8 kHz and 4.5 dB at 15 kHz. For source configurations that are more realistic than a simple piston, large transverse variations in sound pressure are anticipated in the vicinity of the source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266162     DOI: 10.1121/1.2005947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Acoustical transmission-line model of the middle-ear cavities and mastoid air cells.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sound pressure distribution within natural and artificial human ear canals: forward stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Finite-Element Modelling of the Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Nima Maftoon; Jacob Pitaro; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-07

5.  The Auditory Mechanics of the Outer Ear of the Bush Cricket: A Numerical Approach.

Authors:  Emine Celiker; Thorin Jonsson; Fernando Montealegre-Z
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Analytical and numerical modeling of the hearing system: Advances towards the assessment of hearing damage.

Authors:  Annalisa De Paolis; Marom Bikson; Jeremy T Nelson; J Alexander de Ru; Mark Packer; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The effect external and middle ears have in otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christiane Marques do Couto; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.