Literature DB >> 31062070

Effect of mechanical percussion combined with patient position change on the elimination of upper urinary stones/fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tao Zeng1,2,3, Hans-Göran Tiselius4, Jian Huang1,2,3, Tuo Deng1,2,3, Guohua Zeng1,2,3, Wenqi Wu5,6,7.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of mechanical percussion combined with changed patient position (MPPP) on elimination of residual stones/fragments in the upper urinary tract. The study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature review using Pubmed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library was conducted to obtain randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of MPPP treatment of patients with residual stones/fragments in the upper urinary tract. The retrieval of data ended in October 2018. Statistical analysis was carried out using summarized unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seven RCTs comprising 1132 patients were included. Compared with patients in the control group, patients treated with MPPP had higher stone-free rates (SFRs) with RR 1.55 (CI 1.11-2.18; p = 0.01) and lower complication rates with RR 0.48 (CI 0.25-0.94, p = 0.03). In subgroup analysis based on stone location, the SFR for the lower calyx was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group: RR 1.80 (CI 1.47-2.21, p < 0.00001). In subgroup analysis based on complication type, compared with the control patients, the intervention patients had lower hematuria rate with RR 0.46 (CI 0.28-0.74, p = 0.001) and lower leucocyturia rate with RR 0.33 (CI 0.12-0.89, p = 0.03). MPPP is a worthwhile non-invasive method for elimination of residual stones/fragments in the upper urinary tract. Furthermore, we recommend MPPP for patients with residual stones or fragments located in the lower calyces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical percussion; Position change; Residual stones; Upper urinary tract

Year:  2019        PMID: 31062070     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01140-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  29 in total

Review 1.  Management of residual stones.

Authors:  F C Delvecchio; G M Preminger
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  LONG-TERM SURVEY OF 538 PATIENTS WITH UPPER URINARY TRACT STONE.

Authors:  R E WILLIAMS
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1963-12

3.  Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  F J Sampaio; A H Aragao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Aditya Bagrodia; Amit Gupta; Karim Bensalah; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Yair Lotan; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy.

Authors:  Athanasios N Argyropoulos; David A Tolley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  Treatment of Distal Ureteral Calculi Using Extracorporeal Physical Vibrational Lithecbole Combined with Tamsulosin: A New Option to Speed Up Obstruction Relief.

Authors:  Guanlin Liu; Yue Cheng; Weijie Wu; Xiaolong Jia; Jiasheng Hu; Guohai Xie; Xueqin Chen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  In vitro comparison of prototype magnetic tool with conventional nitinol basket for ureteroscopic retrieval of stone fragments rendered paramagnetic with iron oxide microparticles.

Authors:  Yung K Tan; Stacey L McLeroy; Stephen Faddegon; Ephrem Olweny; Raul Fernandez; Heather Beardsley; Bruce Gnade; Samuel Park; Margaret S Pearle; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K T Pace; N Tariq; S J Dyer; M J Weir; R J D'A Honey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update.

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; C Renner; C Chaussy; S Thüroff
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan; Syed M Nazim; Basit Salam; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-08-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  The characteristics and influencing factors of fever in postoperative patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Jieyu Pu; Tingting Wu; Li Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  A single center study that evaluates the preclinical use of a newly developed software and moving bed system to facilitate the spontaneous excretion of residual fragments after primary stone treatment (RIRS or PCNL).

Authors:  Tao Yang; Rijin Song; Xianghu Meng; Hanping Wei; Xinying Jiang; Xiaoliang Yuan; Xiaowu Liu; Zhimin Jiao; Jun Liu; Honglei Shi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.