Literature DB >> 1732584

Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

F J Sampaio1, A H Aragao.   

Abstract

In addition to the gravity-dependent position, we believe that other particular anatomical features may be important in the retention of stone debris in the lower calices after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). We analyzed the inferior pole collecting system anatomy in 146, 3-dimensional polyester resin corrosion endocasts of the pelviocaliceal system. The inferior pole was drained by multiple calices disposed in 2 rows in 56.8% of the cases and by 1 midline caliceal infundibulum in 43.2%. In 60.3% of the cases there was a lower infundibulum equal to or greater than 4 mm. in diameter and 39.7% had a lower infundibulum smaller than 4 mm. in diameter. In 74.0% of the cases an angle of greater than 90 degrees was formed between the lower infundibulum and the renal pelvis, and in 26.0% the angle was 90 degrees or smaller. We believe that the physician should consider these anatomical features when suggesting ESWL to treat calculi in the lower calices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1732584     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37226-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  Pelvi-calyceal height, a predictor of success when treating lower pole stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  A Symes; G Shaw; D Corry; S Choong
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-06-04

2.  The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozgür Tan; Lokman Irkilata; Ilker Sen; Metin Onaran; Bora Küpeli; Ustünol Karaoğlan; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-04-20

Review 3.  To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Javier E Santiago; Adam B Hollander; Samit D Soni; Richard E Link; Wesley A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Is there a difference in percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes among various types of pelvicaliceal system?

Authors:  Ozgur Yazici; Murat Binbay; Tolga Akman; Cem Kezer; Faruk Ozgor; Emrah Yuruk; Yalcin Berberoglu; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Influence of the renal lower pole anatomy and mid-renal-zone classification in successful approach to the calices during flexible ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Bruno Marroig; Rodrigo Frota; Marco A Fortes; Francisco J Sampaio; Luciano Alves Favorito
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Renal anatomical factors for the lower calyceal stone formation.

Authors:  A Serdar Gozen; A Serkan Kilic; Tevfik Aktoz; Hakan Akdere
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  The treatment of lower pole renal calculi in 2003.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

8.  Optimal Management of Lower Polar Calyceal Stone 15 to 20 mm.

Authors:  Naveed Haroon; Syed M Nazim; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16

Review 9.  Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management.

Authors:  Michael Straub; Jürgen Gschwend; Christoph Zorn
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  Proportional analysis of the kidney arterial segments.

Authors:  F J Sampaio; J L Schiavini; L A Favorito
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1993
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.