Literature DB >> 22704446

In vitro comparison of prototype magnetic tool with conventional nitinol basket for ureteroscopic retrieval of stone fragments rendered paramagnetic with iron oxide microparticles.

Yung K Tan1, Stacey L McLeroy, Stephen Faddegon, Ephrem Olweny, Raul Fernandez, Heather Beardsley, Bruce Gnade, Samuel Park, Margaret S Pearle, Jeffrey A Cadeddu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a prototype magnetic tool for ureteroscopic extraction of magnetized stone particles. We compared its efficiency for retrieving magnetized calcium oxalate monohydrate stone particles with that of a conventional nitinol basket from the pelvi-collecting system of a bench top ureteroscopic simulator.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Iron oxide microparticles were successfully bound to 1 to 1.5, 1.5 to 2 and 2 to 2.5 mm human calcium oxalate monohydrate stones. Several coated fragments of each size were implanted in the collecting system of a bench top ureteroscopic simulator. Five-minute timed stone extraction trials were performed for each fragment size using a back loaded 8Fr magnetic tool mounted on a 0.038-inch guidewire or a conventional basket. The median number of fragments retrieved per timed trial was compared for the magnetic tool vs the basket using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: For 1 to 1.5 mm fragments the median number retrieved within 5 minutes was significantly higher for the prototype magnetic tool than for the nitinol basket (9.5 vs 3.5, p = 0.03). For 1.5 to 2 mm fragments the magnetic tool was more efficient but the difference in the number of fragments retrieved was not statistically significant (9.5 vs 4.5, p = 0.19). For 2 to 2.5 mm fragments there was no difference between the instruments in the number retrieved (6 per group, p = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The prototype magnetic tool improved the efficiency of retrieving stone particles rendered paramagnetic that were less than 2 mm but showed no advantage for larger fragments. This system has the potential to decrease the number of small retained fragments after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704446     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs.

Authors:  Suoshi Jing; Qiongyan Gai; Xin Zhao; Juan Wang; Yuwen Gong; Yangyang Pang; Chen Peng; Yuejun Tian; Yuhan Wang; Zhiping Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Innovation in Endourology and Minimally Invasive Surgery: Highlights From the 29th World Congress of Endourology and SWL 2011, November 30-December 3, 2011, Kyoto, Japan.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; James F Borin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Effect of mechanical percussion combined with patient position change on the elimination of upper urinary stones/fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zeng; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Jian Huang; Tuo Deng; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Petrisor Geavlete; Razvan Multescu; Bogdan Geavlete
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Arkadiusz Miernik; Konrad Wilhelm; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jens J Rassweiler; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0-2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Rong-Zhen Tao; Qing-Lai Tang; Shuang Zhou; Chun-Ping Jia; Jian-Lin Lv
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.436

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.