Literature DB >> 11696708

Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.

K T Pace1, N Tariq, S J Dyer, M J Weir, R J D'A Honey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare the effectiveness of mechanical percussion and inversion with observation for eliminating lower caliceal fragments 3 months after shock wave lithotripsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 3 months after shock wave lithotripsy 69 patients with residual lower caliceal fragments 4 mm. or less were randomized to receive either mechanical percussion and inversion or observation for 1 month. The observation group then received crossover mechanical percussion and inversion if fragments persisted. All patients were followed with plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder to assess the stone area and stone-free status, and renal tomography or noncontrast spiral computerized tomography to confirm stone-free status. A blinded radiologist reviewed all films. Patients were treated with a mechanical chest percussor applied to the flank while inverted to greater than 60 degrees after receiving 20 mg. furosemide.
RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were randomized to receive immediate mechanical percussion and inversion therapy and 34 observation. Of the patients in the observation group 28 subsequently received mechanical percussion and inversion after completing the observation period. The groups were not different in gender, body mass index, side affected, stone location or renal anatomical features. The mechanical percussion and inversion group had a substantially higher stone-free rate than the observation group (40% versus 3%, respectively, p <0.001). The mechanical percussion and inversion group also had a greater improvement in total stone area than controls (-63.3% versus +2.7%, respectively, p <0.001). No significant adverse effects were noted in the mechanical percussion and inversion group.
CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical percussion and inversion is a safe and effective treatment option for residual lower caliceal fragments 3 months after shock wave lithotripsy. Nearly 50% of patients become stone-free, and stone burden is decreased by 50% in the remainder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11696708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  35 in total

1.  Adjuncts to improve outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Steven Williams; David M Hoenig
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  [Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy].

Authors:  S Schmidt; K Wilhelm
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Innovations in Ultrasound Technology in the Management of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jessica C Dai; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Pelvi-calyceal height, a predictor of success when treating lower pole stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  A Symes; G Shaw; D Corry; S Choong
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-06-04

6.  Adjunctive therapy to promote stone passage.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Nuss; Judson D Rackley; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

7.  Treating lower pole renal stones: in defence of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  John Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  [Calyceal stones].

Authors:  C Netsch; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Julianna C Simon; Frank Starr; Marla Paun; Barbrina Dunmire; H Denny Liggitt; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.