| Literature DB >> 30966479 |
Beatriz Santos-Carballal1, Elena Fernández Fernández2, Francisco M Goycoolea3.
Abstract
Non-viral gene delivery vectors have lagged far behind viral ones in the current pipeline of clinical trials of gene therapy nanomedicines. Even when non-viral nanovectors pose less safety risks than do viruses, their efficacy is much lower. Since the early studies to deliver pDNA, chitosan has been regarded as a highly attractive biopolymer to deliver nucleic acids intracellularly and induce a transgenic response resulting in either upregulation of protein expression (for pDNA, mRNA) or its downregulation (for siRNA or microRNA). This is explained as the consequence of a multi-step process involving condensation of nucleic acids, protection against degradation, stabilization in physiological conditions, cellular internalization, release from the endolysosome ("proton sponge" effect), unpacking and enabling the trafficking of pDNA to the nucleus or the siRNA to the RNA interference silencing complex (RISC). Given the multiple steps and complexity involved in the gene transfection process, there is a dearth of understanding of the role of chitosan's structural features (Mw and degree of acetylation, DA%) on each step that dictates the net transfection efficiency and its kinetics. The use of fully characterized chitosan samples along with the utilization of complementary biophysical and biological techniques is key to bridging this gap of knowledge and identifying the optimal chitosans for delivering a specific gene. Other aspects such as cell type and administration route are also at play. At the same time, the role of chitosan structural features on the morphology, size and surface composition of synthetic virus-like particles has barely been addressed. The ongoing revolution brought about by the recent discovery of CRISPR-Cas9 technology will undoubtedly be a game changer in this field in the short term. In the field of rare diseases, gene therapy is perhaps where the greatest potential lies and we anticipate that chitosans will be key players in the translation of research to the clinic.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan structure; gene delivery; non-viral vectors; pDNA; siRNA
Year: 2018 PMID: 30966479 PMCID: PMC6415274 DOI: 10.3390/polym10040444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Barriers to successful in vivo delivery of nucleic acids.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the “proton sponge” hypothesis in which the endosomes containing the complexes with protonable polymers (A) evolve to late endosomes where protons are introduced by ATPase proton pumps, producing protonation of the polymer and a reduction in the pH (B); subsequently, chloride ions will be introduced in a non-active way causing a water inflow due to the osmotic pressure (C). Swelling of the endosomes leads to their rupture and finally release of their content into the cytoplasm (D).
Figure 3Preparation of chitosan-based DNA/siRNA nanoparticles following different strategies.
Figure 4Transfection efficiency expressed as downregulation of JAM-A mRNA in MCF-7 cells: (A) complexes containing CS HDP-12 at (N/P) charge ratio = 1.5; and (B) complexes containing CS HDP-1.9, HDP-12, HDP-29 and HDP-49 at (N/P) charge ratio = 8. Duplex miRNA (dose 1× = 0.05 nmol/well), DharmaFECT (5 µL/well) and Novafect O 25 were used as controls. Data represent mean values (± SD) of three independent biological experiments and three technical replicates. Statistical comparisons were between each treatment and the control of untreated cells using non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test (* p < 0.1; **; p < 0.01***; p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001). Source Santos-Carballal et al. Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 13567 (2015) doi:10.1038/srep13567 [81], licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Summary of chitosans used as non-viral delivery nanovehicles to associate different types of genes.
| Chitosans | Nucleic Acid Name | In Vitro Studies | Major Findings | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Origin | DA (%) | |||||
| Chitosan Seacure Natural Biopolymer Inc., USA | 10 | 102 | Plasmid containing a CMV promoter | Cos-1 cells | The highest level of expression in vitro was obtained using complexes prepared at a N/P = 2 and using a chitosan of | [ |
| 20 | 230 | |||||
| 18 | 540 | |||||
| 10 | 7–92 serie | |||||
| Chitopharm® Cognis Deutschland GmbH & Co., Germany | 5 | 8.9 | siRNA-eGFP duplex | H1299 | Physicochemical properties and in vitro gene silencing of chitosan/siRNA nanoparticles are strongly dependent on chitosan | [ |
| 23 | 11.9 | |||||
| 22 | 64.8 | |||||
| 16 | 114.2 | |||||
| 16 | 170 | |||||
| 46 | 173 | |||||
| Molecular tailored chitosans | <0.2 | 8 | DNA pWizLuc (6.7 kb) | --- | Tailored chitosans include linear (LCO), trisaccharide substituted-(TCO), and self-branched trisaccharide (SB-TCO) substituted chitosan oligomers. This study revealed that, besides differences in the stability of complexes, SB-TCO and DNA formed structures with a larger height and a larger fraction of globular structures compared to the other chitosans. In addition, complexes formed by SB-TCO contained a larger fraction of unbound chitosan, which may lead to increased transfection. | [ |
| 9,8 | ||||||
| 21 | ||||||
| Piramal Healthcare, India | 8 | 8 | eGFPLuc (6.4 kb) | --- | Chitosan buffering capacity and its comparison to PEI on a molar basis revealed that chitosan possesses a higher buffering capacity than PEI in the endosomal pH range. Chitosan–DNA complex alone have an ~2-fold reduced buffering capacity as compared to free chitosan. These findings suggest that the proton sponge effect could be at least partially responsible for mediating chitosan endosomal escape. | [ |
| Protasan Ultrapure, Pronova Biomedical | 14 | 270 | siRNA targeting pGL3 luciferase | CHO K1 HEK 293 | Chitosan–TPP nanoparticles with entrapped siRNA are shown to be better vectors as siRNA delivery vehicles compared to chitosan–siRNA complexes possibly due to their high binding capacity and loading efficiency. | [ |
| 14 | 210 | |||||
| Sigma-Aldrich | 1 | 5 | DNA | -- | Chitosan (5 kDa)/DNA complexes remain in B conformation, and the binding affinity of chitosan to DNA is dependent on pH of media where a great binding affinity is generated at pH 5.4, whereas at pH 12.0 a low affinity with DNA is observed. The charge ratios of chitosan to DNA strongly influence the morphology of complexes formed. At low charge ratio, not all DNA can be entrapped in the complex; at higher ratios, the complexes without free DNA evolve into spherical shape with mean size of nanoscale. | [ |
| Kitomer (Marinard, Canada) | 19 | 500 | Linear calf thymus DNA (13 kbp) | --- | A panel of biophysical techniques (conductivity, zeta potential, dynamic light scattering, atomic force microscopy, circular dichroism and UV/VIS spectroscopy) were used to determine the stoichiometry, net charge, dimensions, conformation and thermal stability of complexes of varying N/P ratio both in water and in 10 mM NaCl. Complexation of partially denaturated DNA in water, and double-helical DNA, showed similar electrostatic behavior and stoichiometry. The behavior for complexing was nearly independent of | [ |
| Primex | 4 | 50 | ||||
| Protasan® UP G 113, Sigma-Aldrich | 10–25 | 160 | miR126 | CFBE41o− | High-content analysis data indicate that miRNA-PEI nanomedicines facilitated greater uptake than miRNA-TPP-chitosan nanoparticles and the commercial transfection agent, RiboJuice®. Polymeric nanoparticles can deliver premiRs effectively to CFBEs to modulate gene expression but must be tailored specifically for miRNA delivery. | [ |
| Chitosan Aldrich Chemical Co. | 12 | 213 | pEGFP-C2 plasmid | A549 | DNA condensation of N90% was achieved at the N/P charge ratio of 6, independent of the chitosan | [ |
| 12 | 98 | |||||
| 12 | 48 | |||||
| 12 | 17 | |||||
| 12 | 10 | |||||
| 39 | 213 | |||||
| 54 | 213 | |||||
| KITTOLIFE, Korea. | 27.5 | 22 | pSV-β-galactosi-dase | 293T | The transfection efficiency of low | [ |
| Seafresh Chitosan Lab, Thailand | 13 | 20 | pcDNA3-CMV-Luc | CHO-K1 | The transfection efficiency of chitosan (CS)/DNA complexes was dependent on the salt form and | [ |
| 13 | 45 | |||||
| 13 | 200 | |||||
| 13 | 460 | |||||
| Chitosan Seacure Pronova Biopolymers, Norway | 15 | 6.6 | pcDNA3-luc | EPC cells | The in vitro transfection efficiency was affected by the polyplex (N/P) charge ratio, the DNA concentration in the complexes, the molecular weight and degree of acetylation of the chitosans. Two favorable formulations were identified: chitosan (DA-15%; 6.6 kDa) (theoretical charge ratio 10) and chitosan (DA-15%; 160 kDa) (theoretical charge ratio 3). The size of the complexes was affected by the degree of acetylation, concentration of DNA, pH, inclusion of a coacervation agent and the charge ratio. | [ |
| 32 | 90 | |||||
| 15 | 160 | |||||
| 25 | 160 | |||||
| Biosyntech, Laval, Canada | 20 | 40 | eGFPLuc | HEK293 | The kinetics of decondensation in relation to lysosomal escape was a most critical structure-dependent process affecting the transfection efficiency of chitosan polyplexes. The most efficient chitosans showed an intermediate stability and a kinetics of dissociation, which occurred in synchrony with lysosomal escape. In contrast, a rapid dissociation before lysosomal escape was found for the inefficient high DA chitosan whereas the highly stable and inefficient complex formed by a high | [ |
| 8 | 10 | |||||
| 8 | 150 | |||||
| 28 | 40 | |||||
| Molecular tailored chitosans | all 0.2 | 146 | gWiz Luc and gWiz GFP | HEK293 | Maximum level of transgene expression was found with chitosan with | [ |
| 32.9 | ||||||
| 24.8 | ||||||
| 16.4 | ||||||
| 11.6 | ||||||
| 8.0 | ||||||
| 4.7 | ||||||
| Sascha Mahtani Chitosan PVT Ltd., India | 1.5 | 26 | miRNA-145 | MCF-7 | Chitosan–miRNA nanocomplexes with degree of acetylation 12% and 29% were biologically active, showing successful downregulation of target mRNA expression in MCF-7 cells. We found no evidence that these complexes were cytotoxic towards MCF-7 cells. DA has an influence on the transfection efficiency for complexes with equivalent (+/−) charge ratio (8.0): more efficient downregulation of the target gene in the presence of intermediate DA (~30%) | [ |
| 12 | 25 | |||||
| 29 | 20 | |||||
| 49 | 18 | |||||
| 1.6 | 1.3 | |||||
| 11 | 1.2 | |||||
| 25 | 1.1 | |||||
| 67 | 1.9 | |||||
| Sigma-Aldrich | 15–25 | 192 | siRNAs targeting the VEGF gene | DLD-1 | Particles with different cross-linkers were prepared. Chitosan–TPP nanoparticles showed better siRNA protection during storage at 4 °C. TEM micrographs revealed the assorted morphology of chitosan–TPP–siRNA nanoparticles in contrast to irregular morphology displayed by chitosan–DS–siRNA and chitosan–PGA–siRNA nanoparticles. All siRNA loaded chitosan–TPP–DS–PGA nanoparticles showed initial burst release followed by sustained release of siRNA. All the formulations showed low and concentration-dependent cytotoxicity with human colorectal cancer cells (DLD-1), in vitro. The cellular uptake studies with chitosan–TPP–siRNA nanoparticles showed successful delivery of siRNA within cytoplasm of DLD-1 cells. | [ |
| Sigma-Aldrich | -- | Low | pEGFPN1 | HEK293 | Suitable candidate for gene delivery would be alginate–chitosan nanoparticles. The effect of alginate on reducing the strength of electrostatic interactions between chitosan and pDNA, resulting in better transfection and increasing the plasmid release. | [ |
| Protasan UP CL 113 FMC Biopolymers (Norway) | 10–15 | ~110 | pEGFP-C1 and pβ-gal | HCE; IOBA-NHC | Evidence of the potential of hyaluronic acid (HA)–chitosan nanoparticles, which exhibit very low cytotoxicity for the targeting and further transfer of genes to the ocular surface. | [ |
| Ditto | 10–15 | ~110 | pSEAP | IOBA-NHC; HCE; RAW264.7 | HA-chitosan oligomer (CSO)-based nanoparticles (HA–CSO NPs) were internalized by two different ocular surface cell lines by an active transport mechanism. Potential use of HA–CSO NPs to deliver genetic material to the ocular surface. | [ |
| Ditto | 10–15 | ~110 | Luciferase duplex siRNA (21 bp) | A549-Luc | Chitosan–TPP nanoparticles without and with HA (CS–TPP–siRNA and CS–TPP–HA–siRNA, respectively); N/P charge ratio 5–200, diameter ~320–420 nm. Inclusion of HA reduced the cytotoxicity. Greater inhibition of luciferase expression was for CS–HA NPs (N/P = 120)-luciferase knockdown of ~85% (vs. <70% for CS–TPP–siRNA). | [ |
| Ditto | 10–15 | ~110 ~10 (depolyme-rized) | gWizTM pSEAP | Calu-3 (in air-liquid interface) | Chitosan–TPP NPs comprising anionic β-cyclodextrins; 5% DNA loading; diameter ~264–358 nm. Slightly lower cytotoxicity for NPs comprising CDs; interaction of NPs with Calu-3 cells studied by CLSM. Pharmacokinetics of SEAP expression: NPs of chitosan–TPP, and chitosan–TPP–carboxymethyl-β-CD had greater transfection efficiency than those comprising sulfobutylether-β-CD. In NPs comprising chitosan of ~10 kDa, this effect was not observed. | [ |
| Fluka | -- | 111 | pCMV Lac-Z (7kbp) | HeLa | Chitosan–DNA polyplexes of N/P charge ratio 1–20. The chitosan of higher valence ( | [ |
| -- | 266 | pCMV-Luc | ||||
| -- | 467 | (6kbp) | ||||
| Shrimp shell | 24 | -- | -- | L929 BHK21 (C13) | Biocompatibility was investigated for: (1) cell adherence and growth on the chitosan samples as substrate; (2) the effect of extract media on 2-day and 7-day growth; and (3) the presence of an inhibition zone. The results were similar for both cell lines. | [ |
| 14 | -- | |||||
| Cuttlefish | 19 | -- | ||||
| 10 | -- | |||||
| UltrasanTM, Biosyntech Inc., Canada | 2 | 120 | eGFPLuc | HEK293 | Results revealed an important coupling between DA and | [ |
| 8 | 200 | |||||
| 20 | 320 | |||||
| 28 | 220 | |||||
| Vanson, USA | 10 | 390 | pcDNA encoding for Luc. | HEK293 HeLa SW756 | Degree of chitosan deacetylation is an important factor in chitosan–DNA nanoparticle formulation as it affects DNA binding, release and gene transfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo. | [ |
| 30 | 209 | |||||
| 38 | 138 | |||||
| Marinard, Canada | 28 | 10 | siRNA | EGFP + H1299 | Highly deacetylated chitosans are superior siRNA delivery systems compared to partially acetylated chitosans. Highly deacetylated chitosans (low DA and high | [ |
| 120 | ||||||
| 20 | 10 | |||||
| 120 | ||||||
| 8 | 5 | |||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 40 | ||||||
| 80 | ||||||
| 120 | ||||||
| 2 | 10 | |||||
| 120 | ||||||
| Yaizu Industry, Japan | 20 | 15 | pGL3 | A549 HeLa B16 | Transfection efficiencies of the pGL3/chitosan complexes were dependent on pH of culture medium, stoichiometry of pGL3: chitosan, serum, and molecular mass of chitosan. | [ |
| 6 | 52 | |||||
| 8 | >100 | |||||
| Sigma–Aldrich | 34 | 50 | pMAX-eGFP | HEK293 H441 16HBE | The morphology and the net charge of chitosan–pDNA aggregates is mainly controlled by the overall stoichiometric ratio between the positively charged (protonated) groups on chitosan chains and the negative charges on the DNA. Complexes with the higher molecular weight chitosan are more stable, and clearly demonstrate a significantly higher transfection efficiency. | [ |
| 43 | 150 | |||||
| KiOmedicine-CsU from | 14 | 44 | siRNAluc GI3 | H1299 pGL3 (expressing Luc reporter gene) | Comparisons of biophysical and transfection efficiency properties of fungal chitosans with similar DA, and | [ |
| 16 | 63 | |||||
| 19 | 93 | |||||
| 22 | 144 | |||||
| Protasan UPG Pronova Biopolymer, Norway | 0.1 | 1.2–10 | gWizTM-Luc pCMV-Luc | HEK293 HeLa | A major improvement of chitosan-mediated non-viral gene delivery to the lung was obtained by using polyplexes of well-defined chitosan oligomers. Polyplexes of oligomer fractions also had superior physicochemical properties to commonly used high-molecular-weight ultrapure chitosan (UPC). | [ |
| Norwegian Biopolymer Laboratory | 0 | 5–6 | pNGVL-eGFPLuc | CFBE41o− HEK293 | The transfection efficacy of polyplexes in the CFBE41o− cell line was poor compared with that in HEK293 cells. The narrow-size-distributed chitosan at low pH shows a better transfection efficiency compared with PEI. | [ |
| HMC+, Germany | 30 | 20 | pEGFP-C1 or pEGFP-C1/siRNA | CFBE41o− | Proof-of-principle that co-transfection with chitosan, as a natural non-toxic vector, might be an effective delivery system in a human CF cell line, reaching comparable levels to those achieved using lipid-based systems. | [ |
| HMC+, Germany | 30 | 20 | wtCFTR-mRNA | CFBE41o− | Transfection of an immortalized CF cell line with wtCFTR-mRNA using chitosan as a carrier results in increased CFTR function | [ |
| HMC+, Germany | 30 | 30 | CFTR-LNA | -- | CFTR-specific locked nucleic acids (LNA) biopolymer-based nanoparticles represent a promising system for further development of new lung-targeted CF therapeutic approaches. First time the use of chitosan from a non-animal source as a potential therapeutic vector has been reported. | [ |
| ChiPro, Germany | 20 | 200 | ||||
Figure 5Representative TEM images of complexes containing: (A) CS HDP-29 N/P = 8; and (B) CS LDP-25 N/P = 0.6 stained with uranyl acetate. The embedded table shows the measured diameter of the complexes using ImageJ v1.49n (n = 8; mean average ± SD). Source Santos-Carballal et al. Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 13567 (2015) doi:10.1038/srep13567 [81], licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 6Tapping mode AFM height topographs of: uncomplexed pBR322 (A); and linear DNA (C); alongside with complexes of these formed when mixed with the chitosan C (0.01,162) (B, D) cDNA 4 µg/mL and N/P = 1. Reprinted with permission from Danielsen et al. (2004) Biomacromolecules 5, 928–936 [120]. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7General principle of SPR, where n2 is the refractive index of medium with lower refractive index, E is the evanescent field amplitude, ksp is the wavevector of surface plasmons, and kx is the wavevector of photon.
Figure 8Saturation curve for hsa-miR-145-5p with HDP-12. Acetate buffer (35 mM, pH 5.1/10 mM NaCl) (n = 2). Source Santos-Carballal et al. Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 13567 (2015) doi:10.1038/srep13567 [81], licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 9Schematic view of an isothermal titration calorimeter.
Figure 10Simplified scheme of RNA interference mechanism in mammalian cells. Only processes mentioned in the text are illustrated.