Literature DB >> 30952510

Evaluating the Use of a Decision Aid for Parents Facing Extremely Premature Delivery: A Randomized Trial.

Úrsula Guillén1, Amy Mackley2, Naomi Laventhal3, Stephanie Kukora3, Lori Christ4, Matthew Derrick5, Jennifer Batza5, Sarvin Ghavam6, Haresh Kirpalani4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess decisional conflict and knowledge about prematurity among mothers facing extreme premature delivery when the counseling clinicians were randomized to counsel using a validated decision aid compared with usual counseling. STUDY
DESIGN: In this randomized trial, clinicians at 5 level III neonatal intensive care units in the US were randomized to supplement counseling using the decision aid or to counsel mothers in their usual manner. We enrolled mothers with threatened premature delivery at 220/7 to 256/7 weeks of gestation within 7 days of their counseling. The primary outcome was the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) score. One hundred mothers per group were enrolled to detect a clinically relevant effect size of 0.4 in the Decisional Conflict Scale. Secondary outcomes included knowledge about prematurity; scores on the Preparedness for Decision Making scale; and acceptability.
RESULTS: Ninety-two clinicians were randomized and 316 mothers were counseled. Of these, 201 (64%) mothers were enrolled. The median gestational age was 24.1 weeks (IQR 23.7-24.9). In both groups, DCS scores were low (16.3 ± 18.2 vs 16.8 ± 17, P = .97) and Preparedness for Decision Making scores were high (73.4 ± 28.3 vs 70.5 ± 31.1, P = .33). There was a significantly greater knowledge score in the decision aid group (66.2 ± 18.5 vs 57.2 ± 18.8, P = .005). Most clinicians and parents found the decision aid useful.
CONCLUSIONS: For parents facing extremely premature delivery, use of a decision aid did not impact maternal decisional conflict, but it significantly improved knowledge of complex information. A structured decision aid may improve comprehension of complex information. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01713894.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision aids; decision making; extremely premature; infant

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30952510      PMCID: PMC6625526          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  48 in total

1.  Medical staff guidelines for periviability pregnancy counseling and medical treatment of extremely premature infants.

Authors:  Joseph W Kaempf; Mark Tomlinson; Cindy Arduza; Shelly Anderson; Betty Campbell; Linda A Ferguson; Mara Zabari; Valerie T Stewart
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Comparison of mothers' and counselors' perceptions of predelivery counseling for extremely premature infants.

Authors:  Heather T Keenan; Mia W Doron; Beth A Seyda
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign.

Authors:  Barry D Weiss; Mary Z Mays; William Martz; Kelley Merriam Castro; Darren A DeWalt; Michael P Pignone; Joy Mockbee; Frank A Hale
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-14

5.  A randomised controlled trial of a decision-aid leaflet to facilitate women's choice between pregnancy termination methods.

Authors:  S S M Wong; J G Thornton; B Gbolade; H L Bekker
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Man-Son-Hing; A Laupacis; A M O'Connor; J Biggs; E Drake; E Yetisir; R G Hart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Spiritual and religious components of patient care in the neonatal intensive care unit: sacred themes in a secular setting.

Authors:  E A Catlin; J H Guillemin; M M Thiel; S Hammond; M L Wang; J O'Donnell
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  International comparison of care for very low birth weight infants: parents' perceptions of counseling and decision-making.

Authors:  J Colin Partridge; Alma M Martinez; Hiroshi Nishida; Nem-Yun Boo; Keng Wee Tan; Chap-Yung Yeung; Jen-Her Lu; Victor Y H Yu
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Timothy Whelan; Carol Sawka; Mark Levine; Amiram Gafni; Leonard Reyno; Andrew Willan; Jim Julian; Susan Dent; Hakam Abu-Zahra; Edmond Chouinard; Richard Tozer; Kathleen Pritchard; Ilona Bodendorfer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Characterising doctor-parent communication in counselling for impending preterm delivery.

Authors:  J A F Zupancic; H Kirpalani; J Barrett; S Stewart; A Gafni; D Streiner; M L Beecroft; P Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.747

View more
  8 in total

1.  Decisional Satisfaction, Regret, and Conflict Among Parents of Infants with Neurologic Conditions.

Authors:  Margaret H Barlet; Peter A Ubel; Kevin P Weinfurt; Hannah C Glass; Kathryn I Pollak; Debra H Brandon; Monica E Lemmon
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 6.314

Review 2.  Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.

Authors:  Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

3.  Decision making at extreme prematurity: Innovation in clinician education.

Authors:  Anne Sullivan; Christy L Cummings
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.311

4.  Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J F M van den Heuvel; J J Huisman; E M Lutke Holzik; M N Bekker; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Optimism bias in understanding neonatal prognoses.

Authors:  Babina Nayak; Jee-Young Moon; Mimi Kim; Baruch Fischhoff; Marlyse F Haward
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Historical Perspectives: Shared Decision Making in the NICU.

Authors:  Anne Sullivan; Christy Cummings
Journal:  Neoreviews       Date:  2020-04

7.  Effect of Neonatal Outcome Estimates on Decision-Making Preferences of Mothers Facing Preterm Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  André Kidszun; Daniel Matheisl; Susanne Tippmann; Julia Inthorn; Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour; Norbert W Paul; Eva Mildenberger
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Outcomes following medical termination versus prolonged pregnancy in women with severe preeclampsia before 26 weeks.

Authors:  Mariana A Carvalho; Lina Bejjani; Rossana P V Francisco; Elizabeth G Patino; Alexandre Vivanti; Fernanda S Batista; Marcelo Zugaib; Frédéric J Mercier; Lisandra S Bernardes; Alexandra Benachi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.