Literature DB >> 15995039

Comparison of mothers' and counselors' perceptions of predelivery counseling for extremely premature infants.

Heather T Keenan1, Mia W Doron, Beth A Seyda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand mothers' and counselors' perceptions of their roles in decision-making about resuscitation of extremely premature infants at delivery and to assess mothers' and counselors' satisfaction with the counseling and decision-making process.
METHODS: Mothers who delivered an infant between 22 and 27 completed weeks of gestation and their self-identified counselor were interviewed using a structured interview format. Mothers' and counselors' perceptions of the content, tone, and directiveness of predelivery counseling and their satisfaction with the decision-making process were compared. Demographic data were collected for the mothers, infants, and counselors. Simple descriptive statistics described demographic characteristics of mothers, counselors, and infants. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine agreement within individual mother-counselor pairs about the content and directiveness of counseling.
RESULTS: Thirty-three counselors and 15 mother-counselor pairs were interviewed. The majority (66.7%) of mothers stated that the counselor had made a treatment recommendation, and 60% stated that they had no choice in how their infant would be treated. Only 27.3% of counselors stated that they had made a recommendation, saying instead that they had described the treatment plan or offered options. Counselors believed that mothers were given a treatment choice in 57.6% of encounters. Specific mother-counselor pairs showed little correlation in their perceptions of whether a treatment recommendation had been made (R = 0.0) or a choice had been given about resuscitation (R = 0.07). Despite a lack of perceived choice, mothers generally believed that they were included in treatment decisions (66.7%) and were satisfied with the amount of influence that they had in the decision-making process (73.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: The decision-making process in this study conforms most closely to a model of informed assent. Mothers may have been satisfied with this type of counseling because they felt informed and included in the decision-making process. Physicians and nurses need to elicit mothers' preferences to incorporate them into the treatment plan, as counseling about the resuscitation of extremely premature infants at delivery is considered directive by mothers even when it is not intended to be directive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995039     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  21 in total

1.  A qualitative study of predelivery counselling for extreme prematurity.

Authors:  Elizabeth Young; Ellen Tsai; Anne O'Riordan
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Prenatal (non)treatment decisions in extreme prematurity: evaluation of Decisional Conflict and Regret among parents.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J Draaisma; R Hermens; H Scheepers; M Woiski; A van Heijst; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Prospective parents' perspectives on antenatal decision making for the anticipated birth of a periviable infant.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Teresa A Savage; Robert E Kimura; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Miriam Kuppermann; William Grobman; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-05

4.  The importance of shared decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Frank Soltys; Sydney E Philpott-Streiff; Lindsay Fuzzell; Mary C Politi
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: from the prenatal through end-of-life period.

Authors:  Teresa T Moro; Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa A Savage; Maria R Reyes; Robert E Kimura; Rama Bhat
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

6.  Evaluating the Use of a Decision Aid for Parents Facing Extremely Premature Delivery: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Úrsula Guillén; Amy Mackley; Naomi Laventhal; Stephanie Kukora; Lori Christ; Matthew Derrick; Jennifer Batza; Sarvin Ghavam; Haresh Kirpalani
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  From powerlessness to empowerment: Mothers expect more than information from the prenatal consultation for preterm labour.

Authors:  Nathalie Gaucher; Antoine Payot
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J F M van den Heuvel; J J Huisman; E M Lutke Holzik; M N Bekker; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Supporting parents' decision making surrounding the anticipated birth of an extremely premature infant.

Authors:  Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa T Moro; Teresa A Savage; Maria Reyes; Marguerite Wydra
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.638

10.  What information do parents need when facing end-of-life decisions for their child? A meta-synthesis of parental feedback.

Authors:  Vicki Xafis; Dominic Wilkinson; Jane Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.