Literature DB >> 35227757

Decisional Satisfaction, Regret, and Conflict Among Parents of Infants with Neurologic Conditions.

Margaret H Barlet1, Peter A Ubel2, Kevin P Weinfurt3, Hannah C Glass4, Kathryn I Pollak3, Debra H Brandon5, Monica E Lemmon6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize decisional satisfaction, regret, and conflict among parents of critically ill infants with neurologic conditions. STUDY
DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled parents of infants with neurologic conditions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Hospital discharge surveys included the validated Family Satisfaction with the ICU (FS-ICU) decision making subscale, Decision Regret Scale (DRS), and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). We defined high satisfaction with decision making as an FS-ICU score ≥75, high decisional regret/conflict as DRS/DCS score >25, and within-couple disagreement as a difference of at least 25 points between scores.
RESULTS: We enrolled 61 parents of 40 infants (n = 40 mothers, n = 21 fathers); 35 mothers and 15 fathers completed surveys. Most mothers reported high satisfaction with decision making (27 of 35; 77%) and low decision regret (28 of 35; 80%); 40% (14 of 35) reported high decisional conflict. Mothers and fathers reported higher decisional conflict in the domains of uncertainty and values clarity compared with the domain of effective decision making (Bonferroni-corrected P < .05). There were no differences in decision outcomes between paired mothers and fathers; however, within any given couple, there were numerous instances of disagreement (7 of 15 for decision regret and 5 of 15 for decisional conflict).
CONCLUSIONS: Many parents experience decisional conflict even if they ultimately have high satisfaction and low regret, underscoring the need for decision aids targeting uncertainty and values clarity. Couples frequently experience different levels of decisional regret and conflict.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical care; neonatology; neurology

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35227757      PMCID: PMC9232962          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   6.314


  44 in total

1.  Association of information satisfaction, psychological distress and monitoring coping style with post-decision regret following breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Joanne Sheehan; Kerry A Sherman; Thomas Lam; John Boyages
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Maternal, paternal, and family health-related quality of life in the context of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Hauser Kunz; Rachel Neff Greenley; Megan Howard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Constructing a Culturally Informed Spanish Decision-Aid to Counsel Latino Parents Facing Imminent Extreme Premature Delivery.

Authors:  Matthew J Drago; Ursula Guillén; Maria Schiaratura; Jennifer Batza; Annette Zygmunt; Anja Mowes; David Munson; John M Lorenz; Christiana Farkouh-Karoleski; Haresh Kirpalani
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-07

4.  Parental decision making in pediatric otoplasty: The role of shared decision making in parental decisional conflict and decisional regret.

Authors:  Paul Hong; Ayala Y Gorodzinsky; Benjamin A Taylor; Jill MacLaren Chorney
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  A psychometric study of the decisional conflict scale in surrogate decision makers.

Authors:  Kristen E Pecanac; Roger L Brown; Jay Steingrub; Wendy Anderson; Michael A Matthay; Douglas B White
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-07-07

6.  Field testing of decision coaching with a decision aid for parents facing extreme prematurity.

Authors:  G P Moore; B Lemyre; T Daboval; S Ding; S Dunn; S Akiki; N Barrowman; A L Shephard; M L Lawson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Values clarification and parental decision making about newborn genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Susana Peinado; Ryan S Paquin; Christine Rini; Myra Roche; Rita M Butterfield; Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell; Donald B Bailey; Megan A Lewis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Mother-father differences in screening for developmental delay in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Maja Cepanec; Karolina Lice; Sanja Simleša
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  User-testing of a decision-support tool for parents facing threatened periviable delivery: The Periviable GOALS decision aid.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Shelley M Hoffman; Tatiana Laitano; Kimberly Coleman-Phox; Esperanza Castillo; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-10-10

10.  Evaluation of a decision aid for women with breech presentation at term: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN14570598].

Authors:  N Nassar; C L Roberts; C H Raynes-Greenow; A Barratt; B Peat
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characterizing the Language Used to Discuss Death in Family Meetings for Critically Ill Infants.

Authors:  Margaret H Barlet; Mary C Barks; Peter A Ubel; J Kelly Davis; Kathryn I Pollak; Erica C Kaye; Kevin P Weinfurt; Monica E Lemmon
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.