| Literature DB >> 30900573 |
Bhavana Sharma1, Robin G Abell2, Tarun Arora3, Tom Antony1, Rasik B Vajpayee4.
Abstract
Optimal outcomes of a cataract surgery largely depend on the successful performance of an anterior capsulotomy. It is one of the most important steps of modern cataract surgery which reduces the risk of capsular tears and ensures postoperative stable intraocular lens (IOL). Anterior capsulotomy is considered ideal if it is round, continuous, well-centered, and overlaps the implanted IOL around its circumference. If any of these features is missing, it can be a cause of impedance for desired surgical and visual outcomes. Manual can opener and manual capsulorhexis are the routine standard techniques employed for manual extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification, respectively. Recent increasing use of femtosecond laser cataract surgery has allowed cataract surgeons to obviate inherent inaccuracies of manual anterior capsulotomy techniques. There is an ongoing quest to find an ideal, risk free, and surgeon-friendly technique of anterior capsulotomy that can be employed for surgery in all types of cataracts.Entities:
Keywords: Capsulorhexis; Femto laser; Zepto laser; capsulotomy; pediatric capsulotomy; plasma blade
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30900573 PMCID: PMC6446625 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1728_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1Can opener capsulotomy is performed by making a series of small tears in the anterior capsule using a cystitome
Figure 2(a–c) Envelope capsulotomy involves making a linear incision in the upper one-third of the anterior capsule. After removal of the nucleus and cortical matter, radial cuts are made and the capsular flap is torn similar to capsulorhexis
Figure 3Continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis can be fashioned by creating a small tear in the center of the anterior capsule and ladvancing the resulting capsular flap into a circular shape by guiding the leading edge with the cystitome or by by grasping the leading edge with a forceps and advancing the tear with frequent regrasping
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy of manual capsulorhexis demonstrating the smoothness of the edges
Overview of various studies highlighting complications encountered in anterior capsulotomy techniques
| Type of capsulotomy | Author | Study type | Sample size | Complications encountered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Envelope | Ndiaye | Prospective | 25 eyes | Postoperative dyscoria |
| Envelope | Akkin | Prospective | 65 eyes | IOL tilt and decentration |
| Comparative evaluation of manual capsulotomies | Oner | Prospective | 95 eyes | Lens decentration more in capsulotomy types other then CCC |
| Manual CCC | Cekic | Prospective | 51 eyes | Altered effective lens position (ELP) in inadequate sized capsulotomies |
| Manual CCC | Wirtitsch | Prospective | 104 eyes | Dysphotopsias and compromised retinal images in decentered capsulotomy |
| Manual CCC | Hollick 1999[ | Prospective | 75 eyes | Large capsulorhexis associated with Posterior capsule wrinkling and PCO |
| Manual CCC | Olali | Prospective | 358 eyes | Breach rhexis in 0.56% cases |
| Femto scond laser | Chang | Retrospective | 170 eyes | Free-floating capsule buttons in 88.8%. Radial anterior capsule tears in 5.3% |
| Femto scond laser | Abell | Prospective cohort | 1626 eyes | Increased rate of anterior capsule tears |
| Femto second laser | Roberts | Prospective | 50 eyes | Capsular block syndrome |
| Plasma blade | Izak | Experimental | 4 porcine eyes | Capsulotomy lacks elastic stiffness |
| Precision Pulse Capsulotomy | Hooshmand | Prospective, multicenter case series | 158 eyes | Incomplete capsulotomy and radial tear. |
CCC – Central circular capsulorhexis; IOL – Intra ocular lens; PCO – Posterior capsular opacification
Figure 5Femtosecond laser capsulotomy has an inherent architecture of near-continuous series of postage-stamp like microperforations
Figure 6Scanning electron microscopy of femtosecond capsulotomy shows aberrant laser shots and a rough edge
Overview of various studies evaluating capsulotomy edges in different anterior capsulotomy techniques
| Type of capsulotomy | Author | Study type | Sample size | Capsulotomy edges |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual CCC | Gimbel | Prospective | 158 eyes | Strong capsular rim that resists tearing |
| Femto second laser | Abell | Prospective cohort | 1626 eyes | Rough edge; postage stamp configuration |
| Femto second laser | Roberts | Prospective interventional | 1500 eyes | Low rate of capsular tear |
| Femto second laser | Auffarth | Experimental | Fresh pig eyes | Stronger anterior capsule opening than the standard manually performed capsulotomy. |
| Femto second laser | Kovács | Prospective | 79 eyes | Low PCO |
| Femto second laser | Nagy | Prospective | 111 eyes | Better overlap of capsular margins and better centration of IOL |
| PPC | Chang | Human cadaver eyes and New Zealand white rabbits | 20 eyes | Smooth and regular |
| PPC | Hooshmand | Prospective, multicenter case series | 100 eyes | Frayed edges |
| Comparison between CCC, Femtosecond laser, and PPC | Thompson | A 3-arm study in paired human cadaver eyes | 44 eyes | PPC edge significantly stronger then Femotosecond laser and manual CCC |
PCO – Posterior capsular opacification; CCC – Central circular capsulorhexis
Figure 7Scanning electron microscopy of precision pulse capsulotomy showing relatively smoother edge as compared to femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy