Literature DB >> 21710951

Femtosecond laser capsulotomy and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis parameters and their effects on intraocular lens centration.

Kinga Kránitz1, Agnes Takacs, Kata Miháltz, Illés Kovács, Michael C Knorz, Zoltán Z Nagy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure and compare sizing and positioning parameters of femtosecond laser capsulotomy with manual continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis (CCC).
METHODS: Femtosecond capsulotomies (Alcon-LenSx Lasers Inc) and CCC were carried out in 20 eyes of 20 patients, respectively. Intraocular lens (IOL) decentration, circularity, vertical and horizontal diameters of capsulotomies, and capsule overlap were measured with Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc) 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery. Between-group differences of parameters and predictors of IOL decentration were determined with repeated measures analysis of variance, chi-square test, and logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Vertical diameter of CCC was statistically significantly higher in the first week and month. Significantly higher values of capsule overlap over 1 year and circularity in the first week showed more regular femtosecond capsulotomies. Horizontal IOL decentration was statistically significantly higher in the CCC group over 1 year. A significant difference was noted between the two groups in dichotomized horizontal decentration values at 0.4 mm with chi-square test after 1 week and 1 year (P=.035 and P=.016, respectively). In univariable general estimating equation models, type of capsulorrhexis (P<.01) and capsule overlap (P=.002) were significant predictors of horizontal decentration. Vertical diameter showed significant correlation to the overlap in the CCC group (1 week: r=-0.91; 1 month: r=-0.76, P<.01; 1 year: r=-0.62, P<.01), whereas no significant correlation was noted in the femtosecond group (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: More precise capsulotomy sizing and centering can be achieved with femtosecond laser. Properly sized, shaped, and centered femtosecond laser capsulotomies resulted in better overlap parameters that help maintain proper positioning of the IOL. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21710951     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20110623-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  57 in total

1.  Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery performed by surgeons-in-training.

Authors:  Greg Brunin; Khurrum Khan; Kristin S Biggerstaff; Li Wang; Douglas D Koch; Sumitra S Khandelwal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  A review of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery for Hawai'i.

Authors:  Ming Chen
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-05

3.  [Current state of refractive surgery of the cornea and lens].

Authors:  M C Knorz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Calculation of ophthalmic viscoelastic device-induced focus shift during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Carolina P de Freitas; Florence Cabot; Fabrice Manns; William Culbertson; Sonia H Yoo; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Comparing the intraoperative complication rate of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery to traditional phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Christian Swinney; Mindy Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Cell death and survival following manual and femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy in age-related cataract.

Authors:  Andrea Krisztina Sükösd; Judit Rapp; Diána Feller; György Sétáló; Beáta Gáspár; Judit E Pongrácz; Hajnalka Ábrahám; Zsolt Biró
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 7.  The journey to femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: new beginnings or a false dawn?

Authors:  S Trikha; A M J Turnbull; R J Morris; D F Anderson; P Hossain
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  [Femtosecond lasers for cataract and refractive lens surgery].

Authors:  W J Mayer; O K Klaproth; F H Hengerer; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Femtosecond laser capsulotomy versus manual capsulotomy: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dao-Wei Qian; Hai-Ke Guo; Shang-Li Jin; Hong-Yang Zhang; Yuan-Cun Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 10.  Visual and refractive outcomes of laser cataract surgery.

Authors:  Heather Chen; Thomas Hyatt; Natalie Afshari
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.