| Literature DB >> 30886338 |
Xavier Siwe-Noundou1,2, Thommas M Musyoka3, Vuyani Moses3, Derek T Ndinteh4, Dumisani Mnkandhla5, Heinrich Hoppe5, Özlem Tastan Bishop6, Rui W M Krause7.
Abstract
According to the 2018 report of the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), a disease caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), remains a significant public health problem. The non-existence of a cure or effective vaccine for the disease and the associated emergence of resistant viral strains imply an urgent need for the discovery of novel anti-HIV drug candidates. The current study aimed to identify potential anti-retroviral compounds from Alchornea cordifolia. Bioactive compounds were identified using several chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques and subsequently evaluated for cytotoxicity and anti-HIV properties. Molecular modelling studies against HIV-1 integrase (HIV-1 IN) were performed to decipher the mode of action of methylgallate, the most potent compound (IC50 = 3.7 nM) and its analogues from ZINC database. Cytotoxicity assays showed that neither the isolated compounds nor the crude methanolic extract displayed cytotoxicity effects on the HeLa cell line. A strong correlation between the in vitro and in silico results was observed and important HIV-1 IN residues interacting with the different compounds were identified. These current results indicate that methylgallate is the main anti-HIV-1 compound in A. cordifolia stem bark, and could be a potential platform for the development of new HIV-1 IN inhibitors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30886338 PMCID: PMC6423119 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41403-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Chemical structures of isolated compounds (1–7) from A. cordifolia and L-chicoric acid.
Figure 2(a) The effects of isolated compounds and crude extract of A. cordifolia on HeLa cell viability. A vertical box and whisker plot shows the range of cell viability data values (n = 3) and the mean cell viability is marked by the horizontal bar. Statistical analyses showed that the data was normally distributed so a one-way ANOVA and a Tukey’s multiple comparison test were performed. Differences of p > 0.05 are not significant and not shown on the graph. p values between 0.01–0.05 are marked as significant (*), 0.001–0.1 marked as very significant (**) and p < 0.001 marked as extremely significant (***). (b) The dose–response plots obtained for the compounds and extracts in an HIV integrase enzyme assay. The % enzyme activity levels were derived from the absorbance values of the experimental sample compared to the untreated (control) samples. The log[compound] is plotted against the % IN enzyme activity. A non-linear regression analysis was used to calculate the IC50 values for the compounds of interest. Data manipulation was performed as described in the methodology.
HIV-1 IN CCD best homology model validation results from different structure quality assessment tools.
| Template: 1QS4 | Top model | |
|---|---|---|
| z-DOPE | −1.64 | −1.48 |
| Verify3D | 94.77 | 92.63 |
| ProSA | −7.45 | −8.63 |
| QMEAN | 0.87 | 0.84 |
| Ramachadran (Favoured) | 99.30 | 99.45 |
| GA341 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Predicted native overlap | 0.96 | 0.94 |
Figure 3HIV-1 IN CCD homology modeling. (a) Template used for modeling studies with missing residues in the 140 s loop (dotted red line) bound to a co-crystallized 5-CITEP inhibitor. (b) Top model selected for docking studies with a complete 140 s loop. Shown in blue sphere is Mg2+ cofactor essential for catalytic mechanism during proviral cDNA-host genome integration. The red spheres are the metal-coordinating water molecules.
Docking results from 100 independent runs per compound with HIV-1 IN CCD.
| Compound name/ID | Docking energy (kcal/mol) | Inhibition constant (μM) | Cluster occupancya |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stigmasterol | −4.32 | 25.97 | 67 |
| Stigmasta-4,22-dien-3-one | −4.42 | 25.43 | 83 |
| Friedelin | −3.82 | 30.72 | 89 |
| Friedelane-3-one-28-al | −3.97 | 30.56 | 85 |
| 3- | −5.08 | 15.15 | 74 |
| Methylgallate* | −5.73 | 12.62 | 100 |
| ZINC77441** | −5.99 | −11.65 | 92 |
| ZINC1576053** | −6.08 | −11.12 | 93 |
| ZINC407934** | −6.20 | −10.86 | 91 |
| ZINC44199891** | −6.17 | −11.03 | 100 |
| L-chicoric acidΔ | −5.56 | −12.87 | 96 |
aNumber of individuals out of 100 in the top-ranked cluster. A.cordifolia most potent anti-HIV IN compound* and its analogues** from ZINC database. ΔPositive control.
Drug like properties and PAINS filtering of methylgallate and its ZINC analogues.
| Compound ID | Chemical formula | Lipinski’s rule of five (RO5) | PAINS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mol. Wt | HbA | HbD | nRB | LogP | |||
| Methylgallate | C8H8O5 | 184.04 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1.26 | Pass |
| ZINC77441 | C15H14O5 | 259.97 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1.84 | Pass |
| ZINC1576053 | C13H10O5 | 235.97 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2.18 | Pass |
| ZINC407934 | C10H12O5 | 199.97 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2.17 | Pass |
| ZINC44199891 | C17H18O4 | 267.98 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1.59 | Pass |
| L-chicoric | C22H18O12 | 474.08 | 12 | 6 | 11 | 1.18 | Pass |
Figure 4Protein-ligand binding pose and interaction. HIV-IN complete CCD bound to (a) methylgallate from A. cordifolia and (b) L-chicoric acid and (c) ZINC407934. Corresponding images show the important residues for coordinating the catalytic Mg2+ as well as interacting with the different ligands. Shown in blue dotted green lines are hydrogen bonds while the radiating residues show the residues forming hydrophobic interactions. The red loop shows the 140 s loop.
Figure 5Dynamic properties of both the apo form and ligand bound HIV-IN CCD over a simulation period of 100 ns. (a,b) The global stability of the different systems as determined by complex and ligand Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD). (c) The compactness of the systems by Radius of Gyration. (d) Local fluctuations of the individual residues by Root Mean Square Fluctuations (RMSF).