Literature DB >> 30876729

Shared Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Imagery.

Nadine Dijkstra1, Sander E Bosch2, Marcel A J van Gerven2.   

Abstract

For decades, the extent to which visual imagery relies on the same neural mechanisms as visual perception has been a topic of debate. Here, we review recent neuroimaging studies comparing these two forms of visual experience. Their results suggest that there is a large overlap in neural processing during perception and imagery: neural representations of imagined and perceived stimuli are similar in the visual, parietal, and frontal cortex. Furthermore, perception and imagery seem to rely on similar top-down connectivity. The most prominent difference is the absence of bottom-up processing during imagery. These findings fit well with the idea that imagery and perception rely on similar emulation or prediction processes.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  connectivity; generative perception; mental imagery; neural representations; temporal dynamics; working memory

Year:  2019        PMID: 30876729     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  29 in total

1.  Offline perception: an introduction.

Authors:  Peter Fazekas; Bence Nanay; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Cortical excitability controls the strength of mental imagery.

Authors:  Rebecca Keogh; Johanna Bergmann; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Looking beyond the binary: an extended paradigm for focus of attention in human motor performance.

Authors:  Rebecca Gose; Amit Abraham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The Face of Image Reconstruction: Progress, Pitfalls, Prospects.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Andy C H Lee; David C Plaut; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Understanding occipital and parietal contributions to visual working memory: Commentary on Xu (2020).

Authors:  Chunyue Teng; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-02-15

6.  Pictorial low-level features in mental images: evidence from eye fixations.

Authors:  Corinna S Martarelli; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-22

7.  Hallucinations as intensified forms of mind-wandering.

Authors:  Peter Fazekas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Attention driven phantom vision: measuring the sensory strength of attentional templates and their relation to visual mental imagery and aphantasia.

Authors:  Rebecca Keogh; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Why do imagery and perception look and feel so different?

Authors:  Roger Koenig-Robert; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Quantifying aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory.

Authors:  Wilma A Bainbridge; Zoë Pounder; Alison F Eardley; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.