Literature DB >> 33308061

Why do imagery and perception look and feel so different?

Roger Koenig-Robert1, Joel Pearson1.   

Abstract

Despite the past few decades of research providing convincing evidence of the similarities in function and neural mechanisms between imagery and perception, for most of us, the experience of the two are undeniably different, why? Here, we review and discuss the differences between imagery and perception and the possible underlying causes of these differences, from function to neural mechanisms. Specifically, we discuss the directional flow of information (top-down versus bottom-up), the differences in targeted cortical layers in primary visual cortex and possible different neural mechanisms of modulation versus excitation. For the first time in history, neuroscience is beginning to shed light on this long-held mystery of why imagery and perception look and feel so different. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback signals; mental imagery; perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33308061      PMCID: PMC7741076          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  77 in total

1.  The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; A Pascual-Leone; O Felician; S Camposano; J P Keenan; W L Thompson; G Ganis; K E Sukel; N M Alpert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Return of the mental image: are there really pictures in the brain?

Authors:  Zenon Pylyshyn
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  The heterogeneity of mental representation: Ending the imagery debate.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Should a Few Null Findings Falsify Prefrontal Theories of Conscious Perception?

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; Robert T Knight; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Corticocortical connections in the visual system: structure and function.

Authors:  P A Salin; J Bullier
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  A voxel-wise encoding model for early visual areas decodes mental images of remembered scenes.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Cheryl A Olman; Dustin E Stansbury; Kamil Ugurbil; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Etiology of depression comorbidity in combat-related PTSD: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Valerie A Stander; Cynthia J Thomsen; Robyn M Highfill-McRoy
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-12-19

Review 8.  Top-down influences on visual processing.

Authors:  Charles D Gilbert; Wu Li
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Visual hallucinations in schizophrenia: confusion between imagination and perception.

Authors:  Gildas Brébion; Ruth I Ohlsen; Lyn S Pilowsky; Anthony S David
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Reversal of cortical information flow during visual imagery as compared to visual perception.

Authors:  Daniela Dentico; Bing Leung Cheung; Jui-Yang Chang; Jeffrey Guokas; Melanie Boly; Giulio Tononi; Barry Van Veen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  Offline perception: an introduction.

Authors:  Peter Fazekas; Bence Nanay; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.