Literature DB >> 33308064

Attention driven phantom vision: measuring the sensory strength of attentional templates and their relation to visual mental imagery and aphantasia.

Rebecca Keogh1, Joel Pearson1.   

Abstract

When we search for an object in an array or anticipate attending to a future object, we create an 'attentional template' of the object. The definitions of attentional templates and visual imagery share many similarities as well as many of the same neural characteristics. However, the phenomenology of these attentional templates and their neural similarities to visual imagery and perception are rarely, if ever discussed. Here, we investigate the relationship between these two forms of non-retinal phantom vision through the use of the binocular rivalry technique, which allows us to measure the sensory strength of attentional templates in the absence of concurrent perceptual stimuli. We find that attentional templates correlate with both feature-based attention and visual imagery. Attentional templates, like imagery, were significantly disrupted by the presence of irrelevant visual stimuli, while feature-based attention was not. We also found that a special population who lack the ability to visualize (aphantasia), showed evidence of feature-based attention when measured using the binocular rivalry paradigm, but not attentional templates. Taken together, these data suggest functional similarities between attentional templates and visual imagery, advancing the theory of visual imagery as a general simulation tool used across cognition. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aphantasia; attention templates; binocular rivalry; visual attention; visual imagery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33308064      PMCID: PMC7741074          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  47 in total

1.  Setting up the target template in visual search.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Li-Wei King; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Pre-target activity in visual cortex predicts behavioral performance on spatial and feature attention tasks.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff; George R Mangun
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Lives without imagery - Congenital aphantasia.

Authors:  Adam Zeman; Michaela Dewar; Sergio Della Sala
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  A neural basis for real-world visual search in human occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Michel F Failing; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Pim Mostert; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Individual differences in visual imagery determine how event information is remembered.

Authors:  Signy Sheldon; Robert Amaral; Brian Levine
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2016-05-05

8.  A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia.

Authors:  Alexei J Dawes; Rebecca Keogh; Thomas Andrillon; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The role of visual imagery in autobiographical memory.

Authors:  Daniel L Greenberg; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

10.  Baseline shifts do not predict attentional modulation of target processing during feature-based visual attention.

Authors:  Sean P Fannon; Clifford D Saron; George R Mangun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Offline perception: an introduction.

Authors:  Peter Fazekas; Bence Nanay; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The pupillary light response as a physiological index of aphantasia, sensory and phenomenological imagery strength.

Authors:  Lachlan Kay; Rebecca Keogh; Thomas Andrillon; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 8.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.