Literature DB >> 32369016

Cortical excitability controls the strength of mental imagery.

Rebecca Keogh1, Johanna Bergmann1,2,3, Joel Pearson1.   

Abstract

Mental imagery provides an essential simulation tool for remembering the past and planning the future, with its strength affecting both cognition and mental health. Research suggests that neural activity spanning prefrontal, parietal, temporal, and visual areas supports the generation of mental images. Exactly how this network controls the strength of visual imagery remains unknown. Here, brain imaging and transcranial magnetic phosphene data show that lower resting activity and excitability levels in early visual cortex (V1-V3) predict stronger sensory imagery. Further, electrically decreasing visual cortex excitability using tDCS increases imagery strength, demonstrating a causative role of visual cortex excitability in controlling visual imagery. Together, these data suggest a neurophysiological mechanism of cortical excitability involved in controlling the strength of mental images.
© 2020, Keogh et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; cortical excitability; fMRI; human; neuroscience; tDCS; visual imagery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32369016      PMCID: PMC7200162          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  103 in total

1.  The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; A Pascual-Leone; O Felician; S Camposano; J P Keenan; W L Thompson; G Ganis; K E Sukel; N M Alpert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Cortical excitability in chronic migraine.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Jean Schoenen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

3.  Network structure and dynamics of the mental workspace.

Authors:  Alexander Schlegel; Peter J Kohler; Sergey V Fogelson; Prescott Alexander; Dedeepya Konuthula; Peter Ulric Tse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interictal cortical excitability in migraine: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor and visual cortices.

Authors:  J Afra; A Mascia; P Gérard; A Maertens de Noordhout; J Schoenen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Dale; B Fischl; M I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS.

Authors:  Ilkka Laakso; Satoshi Tanaka; Soichiro Koyama; Valerio De Santis; Akimasa Hirata
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal areas is related to underlying cortical morphology.

Authors:  Hannah L Filmer; Shane E Ehrhardt; Thomas B Shaw; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Katia Monte-Silva; Min-Fang Kuo; Silvia Hessenthaler; Shane Fresnoza; David Liebetanz; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Modulation of visual cortical excitability by working memory: effect of luminance contrast of mental imagery.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Alberto Pisoni; Costanza Papagno; Juha Silvanto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-25

10.  Combined fMRI-MRS acquires simultaneous glutamate and BOLD-fMRI signals in the human brain.

Authors:  I Betina Ip; Adam Berrington; Aaron T Hess; Andrew J Parker; Uzay E Emir; Holly Bridge
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  6 in total

1.  Attention driven phantom vision: measuring the sensory strength of attentional templates and their relation to visual mental imagery and aphantasia.

Authors:  Rebecca Keogh; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Why do imagery and perception look and feel so different?

Authors:  Roger Koenig-Robert; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Neural representations underlying mental imagery as unveiled by representation similarity analysis.

Authors:  Maddalena Boccia; Valentina Sulpizio; Federica Bencivenga; Cecilia Guariglia; Gaspare Galati
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Imagery adds stimulus-specific sensory evidence to perceptual detection.

Authors:  Nadine Dijkstra; Peter Kok; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  What is the Link Between Mental Imagery and Sensory Sensitivity? Insights from Aphantasia.

Authors:  C J Dance; J Ward; J Simner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia.

Authors:  Fraser Milton; Jon Fulford; Carla Dance; James Gaddum; Brittany Heuerman-Williamson; Kealan Jones; Kathryn F Knight; Matthew MacKisack; Crawford Winlove; Adam Zeman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-05-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.