Literature DB >> 33383478

Quantifying aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory.

Wilma A Bainbridge1, Zoë Pounder2, Alison F Eardley3, Chris I Baker4.   

Abstract

Congenital aphantasia is a recently characterized variation of experience defined by the inability to form voluntary visual imagery, in individuals who are otherwise high performing. Because of this specific deficit to visual imagery, individuals with aphantasia serve as an ideal group for probing the nature of representations in visual memory, particularly the interplay of object, spatial, and symbolic information. Here, we conducted a large-scale online study of aphantasia and revealed a dissociation in object and spatial content in their memory representations. Sixty-one individuals with aphantasia and matched controls with typical imagery studied real-world scene images, and were asked to draw them from memory, and then later copy them during a matched perceptual condition. Drawings were objectively quantified by 2,795 online scorers for object and spatial details. Aphantasic participants recalled significantly fewer objects than controls, with less color in their drawings, and an increased reliance on verbal scaffolding. However, aphantasic participants showed high spatial accuracy equivalent to controls, and made significantly fewer memory errors. These differences between groups only manifested during recall, with no differences between groups during the matched perceptual condition. This object-specific memory impairment in individuals with aphantasia provides evidence for separate systems in memory that support object versus spatial information. The study also provides an important experimental validation for the existence of aphantasia as a variation in human imagery experience.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False memory; Memory recall; Mental imagery; Object information; Spatial information

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33383478      PMCID: PMC7856239          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  52 in total

1.  Loss of visualization.

Authors:  R BRAIN
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1954-04

2.  Greater loss of object than spatial mnemonic discrimination in aged adults.

Authors:  Zachariah M Reagh; Huy D Ho; Stephanie L Leal; Jessica A Noche; Amanda Chun; Elizabeth A Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Visual recognition memory: a double anatomo-functional dissociation.

Authors:  Emmanuel J Barbeau; Jérémie Pariente; Olivier Felician; Michèle Puel
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  The heterogeneity of mental representation: Ending the imagery debate.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phantasia-The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes.

Authors:  Adam Zeman; Fraser Milton; Sergio Della Sala; Michaela Dewar; Timothy Frayling; James Gaddum; Andrew Hattersley; Brittany Heuerman-Williamson; Kealan Jones; Matthew MacKisack; Crawford Winlove
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Remembering what but not where: independence of spatial and visual working memory in the human brain.

Authors:  G A Carlesimo; R Perri; P Turriziani; F Tomaiuolo; C Caltagirone
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  'What' and 'where' in the human brain.

Authors:  L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 8.  Shared Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Imagery.

Authors:  Nadine Dijkstra; Sander E Bosch; Marcel A J van Gerven
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?

Authors:  J S Holdstock; A R Mayes; N Roberts; E Cezayirli; C L Isaac; R C O'Reilly; K A Norman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Mental imagery and visual working memory.

Authors:  Rebecca Keogh; Joel Pearson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Spatial transformation in mental rotation tasks in aphantasia.

Authors:  Binglei Zhao; Sergio Della Sala; Adam Zeman; Elena Gherri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Disrupted object-scene semantics boost scene recall but diminish object recall in drawings from memory.

Authors:  Wilma A Bainbridge; Wan Y Kwok; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-05-24

3.  Where to draw the line?

Authors:  Heping Sheng; John Wilder; Dirk B Walther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Improving face identification of mask-wearing individuals.

Authors:  Krista D Manley; Jason C K Chan; Gary L Wells
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  A tutorial on capturing mental representations through drawing and crowd-sourced scoring.

Authors:  Wilma A Bainbridge
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-08-02

6.  Imagery-related eye movements in 3D space depend on individual differences in visual object imagery.

Authors:  Sandra Chiquet; Corinna S Martarelli; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia.

Authors:  Fraser Milton; Jon Fulford; Carla Dance; James Gaddum; Brittany Heuerman-Williamson; Kealan Jones; Kathryn F Knight; Matthew MacKisack; Crawford Winlove; Adam Zeman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-05-05

8.  Perceived and mentally rotated contents are differentially represented in cortical depth of V1.

Authors:  Polina Iamshchinina; Daniel Kaiser; Renat Yakupov; Daniel Haenelt; Alessandro Sciarra; Hendrik Mattern; Falk Luesebrink; Emrah Duezel; Oliver Speck; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Radoslaw Martin Cichy
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-09-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.