Literature DB >> 2517698

Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.

D I Rosenthal1, A N Tosteson.   

Abstract

There is a positive relationship between bone mass and resistance to breaking. Measurements of the spine made by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) appear to allow a determination of the risk of vertebral compression fracture, although some important confirmatory studies remain to be done. Measurements made in the extremities generally do not allow prediction of vertebral fracture risk. Prediction of hip fracture risk is difficult because of the complex geometry of the femur. The few data which are available suggest that DPA may be useful to predict the risk of femoral neck fracture. If these data can be confirmed, cost-benefit analysis indicates that mass screening for osteoporosis may be a viable strategy. Physicians and patients using bone mass measurement techniques should be aware that these tests can be misleading, and that scrupulous attention to detail is required. Close supervision of the tests by a physician is necessary to ensure that meaningful data are obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2517698      PMCID: PMC1580348     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  17 in total

1.  Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate.

Authors:  D R Carter; W C Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Trabecular bone density in the proximal femur: quantitative CT assessment. Work in progress.

Authors:  D J Sartoris; M André; C S Resnik; D Resnick; C Resnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Are patients with hip fractures more osteoporotic? Review of the evidence.

Authors:  S R Cummings
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy.

Authors:  H K Genant; C E Cann; B Ettinger; G S Gordan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Quantitative computed tomography assessment of spinal trabecular bone. II. In osteoporotic women with and without vertebral fractures.

Authors:  H Firooznia; C Golimbu; M Rafii; M S Schwartz; E R Alterman
Journal:  J Comput Tomogr       Date:  1984-04

6.  Restoration of spinal bone in osteoporotic men by treatment with human parathyroid hormone (1-34) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.

Authors:  D M Slovik; D I Rosenthal; S H Doppelt; J T Potts; M A Daly; J A Campbell; R M Neer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Single and dual energy tomographic analysis of spinal trabecular bone: a comparative study in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Pacifici; N Susman; P L Carr; S J Birge; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  C E Cann; H K Genant; F O Kolb; B Ettinger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K P Offord; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Osteoporosis and the risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  L J Melton; H W Wahner; L S Richelson; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.