Literature DB >> 7696835

Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group.

J A Kanis1.   

Abstract

The criteria required for an effective screening strategy for osteoporosis are largely met in Caucasian women. The disease is common and readily diagnosed by the measurement of bone mineral with single- or dual-energy absorptiometry. Such measurements have high specificity but lower sensitivity, so that the value of the technique is greater for those identified as being at higher risk. Against this background there is little evidence that osteoporosis can usefully be tackled by a public health policy to influence risk factors such as smoking, exercise and nutrition. This suggests that it is appropriate to consider targetting of treatment with agents affecting bone metabolism to susceptible individuals. Since the main benefits of the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are probably on cardiovascular morbidity, the major role for selective screening is to direct non-HRT interventions. An appropriate time to consider screening and intervention is at the menopause, but screening at later ages is also worthy of consideration. Since the cost of screening is low and that of bone-active drugs is high, the selective use of screening techniques will improve the cost-benefit ratio of intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7696835     DOI: 10.1007/BF01622200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  136 in total

1.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M A Hansen; C Hassager; K Overgaard; U Marslew; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Bone loss in the elderly.

Authors:  J A Kanis; S Adami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Predicting fractures in women by using forearm bone densitometry.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Prognosis after breast cancer diagnosis in women exposed to estrogen and estrogen-progestogen replacement therapy.

Authors:  L Bergkvist; H O Adami; I Persson; R Bergström; U B Krusemo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Decreased mortality in users of estrogen replacement therapy.

Authors:  B E Henderson; A Paganini-Hill; R K Ross
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-01

8.  Thiazide diuretics and the risk of hip fracture. Results from the Framingham Study.

Authors:  D T Felson; D Sloutskis; J J Anderson; J M Anthony; D P Kiel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?

Authors:  L J Melton; E A Chrischilles; C Cooper; A W Lane; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  573 in total

Review 1.  Treatment induced changes of bone density and relative risk of vertebral fracture.

Authors:  S Adami; O Viapiana; F Corallo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  The burden of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Preventing fractures in postmenopausal women: how to assess risk.

Authors:  Vincent Fung; David Kendler
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Heel bone mass of a young South Indian population with a Nigerian population residing in a South Indian suburban neighborhood: a comparative study.

Authors:  V Sapthagirivasan; M Anburajan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Normative bone mineral density z-scores for Canadians aged 16 to 24 years: the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Lisa Langsetmo; Claudie Berger; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou; George Ioannidis; Colin Webber; Stephanie A Atkinson; Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; David A Hanley; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Jerilynn Prior; Stephanie Kaiser; Susan Kirkland; David Goltzman; Kenneth Shawn Davison
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Depression and osteoporosis: epidemiology and potential mediating pathways.

Authors:  B Mezuk; W W Eaton; S H Golden
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Risk-equivalent T-score adjustment for using lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS): the Manitoba BMD registry.

Authors:  W D Leslie; E Shevroja; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; N C Harvey; J A Kanis; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  The epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael A Clynes; Nicholas C Harvey; Elizabeth M Curtis; Nicholas R Fuggle; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 9.  Osteoporosis and Periodontitis.

Authors:  Chin-Wei Jeff Wang; Laurie K McCauley
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Low mineral density of a weight-bearing bone among adult women in a high fertility population.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Bret A Beheim; Benjamin C Trumble; Felicia C Madimenos; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.