Literature DB >> 19052738

Reproducibility of DXA measurements of bone mineral density and body composition in children.

Cheryl M Leonard1, Melissa A Roza, Ronald D Barr, Colin E Webber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The technique of X-ray-based dual photon absorptiometry (DXA) is frequently used in children for the detection of changes in bone mass or body composition. Such changes can only be considered real if the uncertainties arising from the measurement technique are exceeded.
OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were twofold: (1) to determine the reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in children at the spine and the hip and from the whole body, as well as of whole-body measurements of mineral mass, lean body mass and fat mass in children; and (2) to estimate, from the measured precision, the time interval that needs to elapse before a statistically significant change in a DXA variable can be detected.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The reproducibility of techniques for the measurement of BMD and body composition using DXA was measured in 15 young children (9 girls and 6 boys) and 17 older children (9 girls and 8 boys).
RESULTS: Reproducibility was derived from the standard deviation of three repeated measurements of spine BMD, total hip BMD, whole-body BMD (WBBMD), whole-body bone mineral content (WBBMC), lean mass and fat mass. Technique precision was better than 0.01 g cm(-2) for spine BMD and for WBBMD. Hip BMD measurements were slightly less precise, particularly in younger children (0.013 g cm(-2)). For body composition variables, technique precision was 13 g for WBBMC, 201 g for lean body mass and 172 g for fat mass in younger children. Technique precision for older children was 18 g, 251 g and 189 g for the corresponding variables. Predictions showed that the absence of a normal increase in WBBMC in a small-for-age girl could be established after 12 months. For spine BMD, a significant increase should be observable after 6 months for boys over the age of 11 years. For younger boys, more than 12 months has to elapse before anticipated changes can be detected with confidence.
CONCLUSION: The time intervals required to elapse before decisions can be made concerning the significance of observed differences between successive measurements of BMD or body composition in children depend upon the age of the child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19052738     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-1067-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  12 in total

1.  Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Ying Lu; Kevin Wilson; Thomas Fuerst; Harry Genant; Thomas N Hangartner; Charles Wilson; Didier Hans; Edward S Leib
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 2.  Photon absorptiometry, bone densitometry and the challenge of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Colin E Webber
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements.

Authors:  P Ravaud; J L Reny; B Giraudeau; R Porcher; M Dougados; C Roux
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Age-predicted values for lumbar spine, proximal femur, and whole-body bone mineral density: results from a population of normal children aged 3 to 18 years.

Authors:  Colin E Webber; Lesley F Beaumont; Judy Morrison; Alessandra Sala; Ronald D Barr
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.248

6.  Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.

Authors:  Mouhanad Hammami; Winston W K Koo; Elaine M Hockman
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice.

Authors:  M C Lodder; W F Lems; H J Ader; A E Marthinsen; S C C M van Coeverden; P Lips; J C Netelenbos; B A C Dijkmans; J C Roos
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; Charles R Wilson; E Michael Lewiecki; Marjorie M Luckey; Robert W Downs; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Reproducibility of pediatric whole body bone and body composition measures by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using the GE Lunar Prodigy.

Authors:  Lauren Margulies; Mary Horlick; John C Thornton; Jack Wang; Elli Ioannidou; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  Pediatric DXA: technique and interpretation.

Authors:  Larry A Binkovitz; Maria J Henwood
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-05-20
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of body composition as a surrogate evaluation of energy balance in obese patients.

Authors:  Carlo Maria Rotella; Ilaria Dicembrini
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-03-26

2.  FGF-23, α-Klotho Gene Polymorphism and Their Relationship with the Markers of Bone Metabolism in Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Vural Taner Yilmaz; Sebahat Ozdem; Levent Donmez; Ramazan Cetinkaya; Gultekin Suleymanlar; F Fevzi Ersoy
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2015-06

3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based body volume measurement for 4-compartment body composition.

Authors:  Joseph P Wilson; Kathleen Mulligan; Bo Fan; Jennifer L Sherman; Elizabeth J Murphy; Viva W Tai; Cassidy L Powers; Lorena Marquez; Viviana Ruiz-Barros; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Bone mass of Spanish school children: impact of anthropometric, dietary and body composition factors.

Authors:  Jesus M Lavado-Garcia; Julian F Calderon-Garcia; Jose M Moran; Maria Luz Canal-Macias; Trinidad Rodriguez-Dominguez; Juan D Pedrera-Zamorano
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Obesity Tissue: Composition, Energy Expenditure, and Energy Content in Adult Humans.

Authors:  Phoenix Hwaung; Anja Bosy-Westphal; Manfred J Muller; Corinna Geisler; Moonseong Heo; Diana M Thomas; Samantha Kennedy; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts.

Authors:  Amanda R Hale; Ann H Ross
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Age- and gender-dependent values of skeletal muscle mass in healthy children and adolescents.

Authors:  Colin E Webber; Ronald D Barr
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 12.910

8.  Advances in the science and application of body composition measurement.

Authors:  Vickie Baracos; Paolo Caserotti; Carrie P Earthman; David Fields; Dympna Gallagher; Kevin D Hall; Steven B Heymsfield; Manfred J Müller; Antonella Napolitano Rosen; Claude Pichard; Leanne M Redman; Wei Shen; John A Shepherd; Diana Thomas
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Physical training in boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: the protocol of the No Use is Disuse study.

Authors:  Merel Jansen; Imelda Jm de Groot; Nens van Alfen; Alexander Ch Geurts
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES.

Authors:  Thomas L Kelly; Kevin E Wilson; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.