Luciano Augusto Cano Martins1, Danieli M Brasil2, Laís A Forner3, Cassiana Viccari3, Francisco Haiter-Neto2, Deborah Q Freitas2, Matheus L Oliveira2. 1. Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, 901-Areião, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. luciano_cano@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Limeira, 901-Areião, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. 3. Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP/USP), Centro de Instrumentação, Dosimetria e Radioproteção (CIDRA), University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900 - Vila Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the overall diagnostic performance of digital panoramic radiographs obtained with low-dose protocols and to estimate the absorbed dose in the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight panoramic radiographs were obtained from eight imaging phantoms using six exposure protocols of progressively lower tube voltages (kVp) and currents (mA), as follows: (1) 70 kVp and 12.5 mA, (2) 66 kVp and 10 mA, (3) 66 kVp and 8 mA, (4) 66 kVp and 5 mA, (5) 66 kVp and 4 mA and (6) 66 kVp and 3.2 mA. Five oral radiologists independently evaluated the images and reported all detectable radiographic findings. Intra-examiner reproducibility was assessed by re-evaluation of 25% of the images. The data were analysed using the McNemar and weighted Kappa tests. Absorbed doses of the six protocols were obtained from thermoluminescent dosimeters placed inside a Rando phantom and compared using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The overall diagnostic performance of panoramic radiographs obtained with low-dose protocols did not differ from that of panoramic radiographs obtained with the highest dose (p > 0.05). Moreover, substantial agreement was observed between all protocols. Protocol 1 resulted in the highest absorbed dose and protocols 4, 5 and 6 in the lowest absorbed doses, with the difference being significant (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although digital panoramic radiography is considered a relatively low-dose examination, the radiation dose can be further reduced without negatively affecting its overall diagnostic performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the risks associated with X-rays, digital panoramic radiographs can be obtained at even lower exposure levels.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the overall diagnostic performance of digital panoramic radiographs obtained with low-dose protocols and to estimate the absorbed dose in the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight panoramic radiographs were obtained from eight imaging phantoms using six exposure protocols of progressively lower tube voltages (kVp) and currents (mA), as follows: (1) 70 kVp and 12.5 mA, (2) 66 kVp and 10 mA, (3) 66 kVp and 8 mA, (4) 66 kVp and 5 mA, (5) 66 kVp and 4 mA and (6) 66 kVp and 3.2 mA. Five oral radiologists independently evaluated the images and reported all detectable radiographic findings. Intra-examiner reproducibility was assessed by re-evaluation of 25% of the images. The data were analysed using the McNemar and weighted Kappa tests. Absorbed doses of the six protocols were obtained from thermoluminescent dosimeters placed inside a Rando phantom and compared using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The overall diagnostic performance of panoramic radiographs obtained with low-dose protocols did not differ from that of panoramic radiographs obtained with the highest dose (p > 0.05). Moreover, substantial agreement was observed between all protocols. Protocol 1 resulted in the highest absorbed dose and protocols 4, 5 and 6 in the lowest absorbed doses, with the difference being significant (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although digital panoramic radiography is considered a relatively low-dose examination, the radiation dose can be further reduced without negatively affecting its overall diagnostic performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the risks associated with X-rays, digital panoramic radiographs can be obtained at even lower exposure levels.