Gabriela-Franco-da Rosa Caetano1, Mariana-Quirino-Silveira Soares2, Luciana-Butini Oliveira3, José-Luiz-Cintra Junqueira4, Monikelly-do Carmo-Chagas Nascimento1. 1. Division of Oral Radiology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo (SP), 13045-755, Brazil. 2. Departamento de Cirurgia, Estomatologia, Patologia e Radiologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil. 3. São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira, 13, Campinas, São Paulo, 13045-755, Brazil. 4. Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas, Division of Oral Radiology, Campinas, Brazil.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare two-dimensional radiographs and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images for mini-implant planning. Material and Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar electronic databases according to PIRD strategy, on September 11, 2021. In vivo studies that compared two-dimensional imaging with CBCT for mini-implant planning were selected. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: The initial search identified 441 papers. Five studies were added following a manual research. Of the total 446 studies, 40 were selected after title evaluation, 29 remained after abstract evaluation, and 11 were left after full-text analysis. Final screening yielded a total of four studies that composed the narrative synthesis of this systematic review. When comparing the imaging systems for palatal mini-implants, lateral radiographs (LRs) showed approximately the same measurements of bone quantity as those of CBCT, hence bearing no influence on placement site selection. In determining image suitability for interradicular mini-implants, two-dimensional radiographs underestimated the available space. Conclusions: Lateral radiography is sufficient to quantify the available bone for planning mini-implants installed on the palate, in the median region of upper first premolars. CBCT enhances interradicular mini-implant planning by aiding in implantation site selection, and improving the installation success rate. Key words:Systematic Review, Cone beam computed tomography, Radiography, Orthodontic mini-implant, Dental planning. Copyright:
Background: This study aimed to compare two-dimensional radiographs and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images for mini-implant planning. Material and Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar electronic databases according to PIRD strategy, on September 11, 2021. In vivo studies that compared two-dimensional imaging with CBCT for mini-implant planning were selected. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: The initial search identified 441 papers. Five studies were added following a manual research. Of the total 446 studies, 40 were selected after title evaluation, 29 remained after abstract evaluation, and 11 were left after full-text analysis. Final screening yielded a total of four studies that composed the narrative synthesis of this systematic review. When comparing the imaging systems for palatal mini-implants, lateral radiographs (LRs) showed approximately the same measurements of bone quantity as those of CBCT, hence bearing no influence on placement site selection. In determining image suitability for interradicular mini-implants, two-dimensional radiographs underestimated the available space. Conclusions: Lateral radiography is sufficient to quantify the available bone for planning mini-implants installed on the palate, in the median region of upper first premolars. CBCT enhances interradicular mini-implant planning by aiding in implantation site selection, and improving the installation success rate. Key words:Systematic Review, Cone beam computed tomography, Radiography, Orthodontic mini-implant, Dental planning. Copyright:
Authors: Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Kristian Kniha; Florian Peters; Sachin Chhatwani; Andreas Prescher; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber; Golamreza Danesh Journal: Orthod Craniofac Res Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 1.826