Literature DB >> 30853752

Evidence for the Influence of Syntax on Prosodic Parsing.

Andrés Buxó-Lugo1, Duane G Watson1.   

Abstract

We investigate whether expectations based on syntactic position influence the processing of intonational boundaries. In a boundary detection task, we manipulated a) the strength of cues to the presence of a boundary and b) whether or not a location in the sentence was a plausible location for an intonational boundary to occur given the syntactic structure. Listeners consistently reported hearing more boundaries at syntactically licensed locations than at syntactically unlicensed locations, even when the acoustic evidence for an intonational boundary was controlled. This suggests that the processing of an intonational boundary is a product of both acoustic cues and listener expectations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psycholinguistics; language processing; prosody

Year:  2016        PMID: 30853752      PMCID: PMC6407892          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  12 in total

1.  Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

Authors:  A J Schafer; S R Speer; P Warren; S D White
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing: evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Daniel Grodner; Edward Gibson; Duane Watson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01-07

3.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception.

Authors:  L A Streeter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Expectations from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence processing.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

10.  Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Sequences of Intonation Units form a ~ 1 Hz rhythm.

Authors:  Maya Inbar; Eitan Grossman; Ayelet N Landau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Endogenous Oscillations Time-Constrain Linguistic Segmentation: Cycling the Garden Path.

Authors:  Lena Henke; Lars Meyer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.