Literature DB >> 10709182

Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

A J Schafer1, S R Speer, P Warren, S D White.   

Abstract

Speakers' prosodic marking of syntactic constituency is often measured in sentence reading tasks that lack realistic situational constraints on speaking. Results from such studies can be criticized because the pragmatic goals of readers differ dramatically from those of speakers in typical conversation. On the other hand, recordings of unscripted speech do not readily yield the carefully controlled contrasts required for many research purposes. Our research employs a cooperative game task, in which two speakers use utterances from a predetermined set to negotiate moves around gameboards. Results from a set of early versus late closure ambiguities suggest that speakers signal this syntactic difference with prosody even when the utterance context fully disambiguates the structure. Phonetic and phonological analyses show reliable prosodic disambiguation in speakers' productions; results of a comprehension task indicate that listeners can successfully use prosodic cues to categorize syntactically ambiguous fragments as portions of early or late closure utterances.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10709182     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005192911512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  8 in total

1.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries.

Authors:  C W Wightman; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; M Ostendorf; P J Price
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.

Authors:  S R Speer; M M Kjelgaard; K M Dobroth
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

4.  Prosodic form and parsing commitments.

Authors:  S M Watt; W S Murray
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

5.  Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.

Authors:  D W Allbritton; G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains.

Authors:  C Fougeron; P A Keating
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Framing sentences.

Authors:  K Bock; H Loebell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-04

8.  Creation of prosody during sentence production.

Authors:  F Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total
  29 in total

1.  Prosodic structure and wh-questions.

Authors:  K Straub; C Wilson; C McCollum; W Badecker
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-07

2.  Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers.

Authors:  K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

3.  Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences.

Authors:  Sun-Ah Jun
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-03

4.  The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-03-16

5.  Constituent length affects prosody and processing for a dative NP ambiguity in Korean.

Authors:  Hyekyung Hwang; Amy J Schafer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-12-09

6.  A possible functional localizer for identifying brain regions sensitive to sentence-level prosody.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Po-Jang Hsieh; Zuzanna Balewski
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts.

Authors:  Jennifer Arnold; Zenzi M Griffin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 8.  Gestural coordination at prosodic boundaries and its role for prosodic structure and speech planning processes.

Authors:  Jelena Krivokapić
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Electrophysiological evidence for the interaction of prosody and thematic fit during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Katherine J Midgley; Tracy Love; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Using prosody during sentence processing in aphasia: Evidence from temporal neural dynamics.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Tracy Love; Katherine J Midgley; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.