Literature DB >> 22096264

Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Michael Wagner1, Duane G Watson.   

Abstract

Research on prosody has recently become an important focus in various disciplines, including Linguistics, Psychology, and Computer Science. This article reviews recent research advances on two key issues: prosodic phrasing and prosodic prominence. Both aspects of prosody are influenced by linguistic factors such as syntactic constituent structure, semantic relations, phonological rhythm, pragmatic considerations, and also by processing factors such as the length, complexity or predictability of linguistic material. Our review summarizes recent insights into the production and perception of these two components of prosody and their grammatical underpinnings. While this review only covers a subset of a broader set of research topics on prosody in cognitive science, they are representative of a tendency in the field toward a more interdisciplinary approach.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22096264      PMCID: PMC3216045          DOI: 10.1080/01690961003589492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  38 in total

1.  Effects of pitch accent position, type, and status on focus projection.

Authors:  Pauline Welby
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little.

Authors:  G Kochanski; E Grabe; J Coleman; B Rosner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Prosodic form and parsing commitments.

Authors:  S M Watt; W S Murray
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

6.  The processing of duration and intensity cues to prominence.

Authors:  A E Turk; J R Sawusch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains.

Authors:  C Fougeron; P A Keating
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustical characteristics of sentential focus: narrow vs. broad and single vs. dual focus environments.

Authors:  S J Eady; W E Cooper; G V Klouda; P R Mueller; D W Lotts
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1986 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

10.  Accent detection is a slippery slope: Direction and rate of F0 change drives listeners' comprehension.

Authors:  Angela M Isaacs; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01
View more
  41 in total

1.  The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: a processing-resource account.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-05-30

2.  Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Jason M Kahn; Giulia C Pancani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

3.  Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011

4.  Modification of spectral features by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 5.  Gestural coordination at prosodic boundaries and its role for prosodic structure and speech planning processes.

Authors:  Jelena Krivokapić
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Misleading Bias-Driven Expectations in Referential Processing and the Facilitative Role of Contrastive Accent.

Authors:  Inbal Itzhak; Shari R Baum
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-10

7.  The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse.

Authors:  Jazmín Cevasco; Paul van den Broek
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-02-22

8.  Evidence for the Influence of Syntax on Prosodic Parsing.

Authors:  Andrés Buxó-Lugo; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Reduction in Prosodic Prominence Predicts Speakers' Recall: Implications for Theories of Prosody.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.