Literature DB >> 21968925

Expectations from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence processing.

Meredith Brown1, Anne Pier Salverda, Laura C Dilley, Michael K Tanenhaus.   

Abstract

Previous work examining prosodic cues in online spoken-word recognition has focused primarily on local cues to word identity. However, recent studies have suggested that utterance-level prosodic patterns can also influence the interpretation of subsequent sequences of lexically ambiguous syllables (Dilley, Mattys, & Vinke, Journal of Memory and Language, 63:274-294, 2010; Dilley & McAuley, Journal of Memory and Language, 59:294-311, 2008). To test the hypothesis that these distal prosody effects are based on expectations about the organization of upcoming material, we conducted a visual-world experiment. We examined fixations to competing alternatives such as pan and panda upon hearing the target word panda in utterances in which the acoustic properties of the preceding sentence material had been manipulated. The proportions of fixations to the monosyllabic competitor were higher beginning 200 ms after target word onset when the preceding prosody supported a prosodic constituent boundary following pan-, rather than following panda. These findings support the hypothesis that expectations based on perceived prosodic patterns in the distal context influence lexical segmentation and word recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21968925      PMCID: PMC3811073          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0167-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; James M McQueen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-11

2.  Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear.

Authors:  Laura C Dilley; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-09-28

3.  Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

4.  Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; Michael K Tanenhaus; Katherine Crosswhite; Mikhail Masharov; Joyce McDonough
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-11

5.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

6.  Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Alexandra Jesse; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Saccadic overhead: information-processing time with and without saccades.

Authors:  E Matin; K C Shao; K R Boff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-04

9.  Erratum: "melodic accent: experiments and a tentative model" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1596-1605 (1982)].

Authors:  J M Thomassen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James A Dixon; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.059

  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  Rhythm as a coordinating device: entrainment with disordered speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The Effect of Dynamic Pitch on Speech Recognition in Temporally Modulated Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The Effect of Non-sentential Context Prosody on Homographs' Lexical Activation in Persian.

Authors:  Parvin Sadat Feizabadi; Mahmood Bijankhan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-12

4.  Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Evidence for the Influence of Syntax on Prosodic Parsing.

Authors:  Andrés Buxó-Lugo; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Laura C Dilley; J Devin McAuley; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Dave Kleinschmidt; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.