Literature DB >> 739094

Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception.

L A Streeter.   

Abstract

How three supersegmental variables (amplitude, pitch contour, and duration pattern) influence phrase boundary perception was investigated in two studies. Listeners located the phrase boundary in ambiguous algebraic expressions, such as "(A plus E) times O" and A plus (E times O)." In one experiment, two values of each of three variables (appropriate or neutral) were orthogonally varied, using linear predictive coding analysis-synthesis procedures. There was a total of eight manipulations for each expression. In the other, the three suprasegmental variables were exchanged between the two alternative meanings of an expression, yielding a total of eight manipulations for each expression. Results from the two studies were consistent in showing that listeners use all three cues, and just these three to parse such utterances. That is, it was possible to completely shift the meaning of an expression uttered with one meaning into its alternate meaning by exchanging all three variables. In both studies, the effects of duration pattern and pitch contour were additive in total proportion correct. Possible models of how listeners process pitch and duration information independently in making a parsing decision are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 739094     DOI: 10.1121/1.382142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers.

Authors:  K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

2.  Perception of phrase structure in music.

Authors:  Thomas R Knösche; Christiane Neuhaus; Jens Haueisen; Kai Alter; Burkhard Maess; Otto W Witte; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing.

Authors:  S Shattuck-Hufnagel; A E Turk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

4.  Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English.

Authors:  Mary Grantham O'Brien; Carrie N Jackson; Christine E Gardner
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Evidence for the Influence of Syntax on Prosodic Parsing.

Authors:  Andrés Buxó-Lugo; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-05

7.  Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency.

Authors:  A Cutler; C J Darwin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-03

8.  Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults.

Authors:  Ken J Hoyte; Hiram Brownell; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning.

Authors:  Jessica F Hay; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2012-11

10.  Indexical properties influence time-varying amplitude and fundamental frequency contributions of vowels to sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.