Literature DB >> 35896044

Audiologic characterization using clinical physiological measures: Normative data from macaque monkeys.

Amy N Stahl1, Jane A Mondul2, Katy A Alek3, Troy A Hackett4, Ramnarayan Ramachandran5.   

Abstract

Clinical auditory physiological measures (e.g., auditory brainstem responses, ABRs, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions, DPOAEs) provide diagnostic specificity for differentially diagnosing overt hearing impairments, but they remain limited in their ability to detect specific sites of lesion and subtle levels of cochlear damage. Studies in animal models may hold the key to improve differential diagnosis due to the ability to induce tightly controlled and histologically verifiable subclinical cochlear pathologies. Here, we present a normative set of traditional and clinically novel physiological measures using ABRs and DPOAEs measured in a large cohort of male macaque monkeys. Given the high similarities between macaque and human auditory anatomy, physiology, and susceptibility to hearing damage, this normative data set will serve as a crucial baseline to investigate novel physiological measures to improve diagnostics. DPOAE amplitudes were robust at f2 = 1.22, L1/L2 = 65/55, increased with frequency up to 10 kHz, and exhibited high test re-test reliability. DPOAE thresholds were lowest from 2-10 kHz and highest < 2 kHz. ABRs with a standard clinical electrode montage (vertex-to-mastoid, VM) produced Waves I-IV with a less frequently observed Wave-I, and lower thresholds. ABRs with a vertex-to-tympanic membrane (VT) electrode montage produced a more robust Wave-I, but absent Waves II-IV and higher thresholds. Further study with the VM montage revealed amplitudes that increased with stimulus level and were largest in response to click stimuli, with Wave-II showing the largest ABR amplitude, followed by -IV and -I, with high inter- and intra-subject variability. ABR wave latencies decreased with stimulus level and frequency. When stimulus presentation rate increased or stimuli were presented in close temporal proximity, ABR amplitude decreased, and latency increased. These findings expand upon existing literature of normative clinical physiological data in nonhuman primates and lay the groundwork for future studies investigating the effects of noise-induced pathologies in macaques.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Physiology; auditory brainstem response; distortion product otoacoustic emissions; electrophysiology; nonhuman primates; peripheral auditory function

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35896044      PMCID: PMC9529828          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.672


  115 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses in 10 inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhou; Philip H-S Jen; Kevin L Seburn; Wayne N Frankel; Qing Y Zheng
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Responses of anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat to click pairs as simulated echoes.

Authors:  K Parham; H B Zhao; Y Ye; D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  What defines asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss?

Authors:  Nedim Durakovic; Michael Valente; Joel A Goebel; Cameron C Wick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Rama Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Otoacoustic emission, evoked potential, and behavioral auditory thresholds in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  R E Lasky; A A Soto; M L Luck; N K Laughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans.

Authors:  M Don; A R Allen; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Low-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in two species of kangaroo rats: implications for auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  L A Shaffer; G R Long
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Wenhe Tu; Hannah Guest; Rebecca E Millman; Karolina Kluk; Samuel Couth; Kevin J Munro; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Coding Deficits in Noise-Induced Hidden Hearing Loss May Stem from Incomplete Repair of Ribbon Synapses in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Lijuan Shi; Yin Chang; Xiaowei Li; Steven J Aiken; Lijie Liu; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Towards the preferred stimulus parameters for distortion product otoacoustic emissions in adults: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Lucretia Petersen; Wayne J Wilson; Harsha Kathard
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.