| Literature DB >> 30845651 |
Carmen Rodríguez-García1,2, Cristina Sánchez-Quesada3,4,5, Estefanía Toledo6,7,8, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez9,10,11, José J Gaforio12,13,14,15.
Abstract
Dietary guidelines universally advise adherence to plant-based diets. Plant-based foods confer considerable health benefits, partly attributable to their abundant micronutrient (e.g., polyphenol) content. Interest in polyphenols is largely focused on the contribution of their antioxidant activity to the prevention of various disorders, including cardiovascular disease and cancer. Polyphenols are classified into groups, such as stilbenes, flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans and others. Lignans, which possess a steroid-like chemical structure and are defined as phytoestrogens, are of particular interest to researchers. Traditionally, health benefits attributed to lignans have included a lowered risk of heart disease, menopausal symptoms, osteoporosis and breast cancer. However, the intake of naturally lignan-rich foods varies with the type of diet. Consequently, based on the latest humans' findings and gathered information on lignan-rich foods collected from Phenol Explorer database this review focuses on the potential health benefits attributable to the consumption of different diets containing naturally lignan-rich foods. Current evidence highlight the bioactive properties of lignans as human health-promoting molecules. Thus, dietary intake of lignan-rich foods could be a useful way to bolster the prevention of chronic illness, such as certain types of cancers and cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidants; chronic diseases; diet; health promotion; lignans
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30845651 PMCID: PMC6429205 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24050917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structural subgroups of lignans (Ar=Aryl).
Figure 2Biosynthetic pathway of lignans. NGT (pinoresinol glucosyltransferase), PSS (piperitol/sesamin synthase), PLR (pinoresinol/lariciresinol reductase), LGT (lariciresinol glycosyltransferase), SGT (secoisolariciresinol glycosyltransferase), SID (matairesinol O-methyltransferase), MMT (matairesinol O-methyltransferase), Glc (Glucoside).
Lignan content of sesame seed (mg/100g food). Data collected from phenol explorer [18].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sesame seed | 7.2 | 0.01 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 1.77 | 0.75 | 0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1.61 | 10.37 | 0.08 | 29.79 | 4.15 | 0.08 | 0.1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0.01 | 538.08 | 102.86 | 133.94 | 0.2 | 2.47 | 834.57 |
Lignans: 7-Hydroxymatairesinol (HMA), 7-Hydroxysecoisolariciresinol (HSE), 7-Oxomatairesinol (OXO), Arctigenin (ARC), Conidendrin (CON), Cyclolariciresinol (CYC), Dimethylmatairesinol (DIM), Isohydroxymatairesinol (IHM), Isolariciresinol (ISO), Lariciresinol (LAR), Lariciresinol-sesquilignan (LAS), Matairesinol (MAT), Medioresinol (MED), Nortrachelogenin (NOR), Secoisolariciresinol (SEC), Secoisolariciresinol-sesquilignan (SECS), Sesamin (SES), Sesaminol (SEI), Sesamolin (SEN), Syringaresinol (SYR), Todolactol A (TOD).
Lignan content of seeds (mg/100g food) [18].
| LAR | MAT | MED | SEC | SYR | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Seeds | ||||||
| Flaxseed | 11.46 | 6.68 | - | 257.6 | - | 257.6 |
| Sunflower seed | 0.67 | 0.67 | - | 0.18 | - | 1.52 |
| Nuts | ||||||
| Almond | 0.03 | 3 × 10−4 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.10 |
| Brazil nut | - | 0.01 | - | 0.77 | - | 0.78 |
| Cashew nut | 49.6 | 2.5 × 10−3 | - | 6.73 | - | 56.33 |
| Chesnut | 7.8 × 10−3 | 8.42 × 10−3 | - | 0.2 | - | 0.21 |
| Hazelnut | 0.01 | 3.3 × 10−3 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.06 |
| Peanut | 4.1 | 2.5 × 10−3 | - | 2.7 | - | 6.8 |
| Pecan nut | 8.4 × 10−3 | 3.15 × 10−3 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.02 |
| Pistachio | 0.12 | 1 × 10−4 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.16 |
| Walnut | 7.2 × 10−3 | 3.8 × 10−3 | - | 0.12 | - | 0.13 |
| Pulses-Beans | ||||||
| Common bean white | 0.12 | 1 × 10−3 | - | 0.08 | 8 × 10−3 | 0.2 |
| Broad bean seed whole | - | 8.9 × 10−4 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.09 |
| Mung bean | - | - | - | 0.18 | - | 0.18 |
| Soy and soy products | ||||||
| Soy paste, miso | 0.02 | 3.6 × 10−3 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.03 |
| Soy flour | - | 7.5 × 10−3 | - | 0.3 | - | 0.3 |
| Soy tempe | 0.01 | 5 × 10−4 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.02 |
| Soy tofu | 0.04 | 7.27 × 10−5 | 8.5 × 10−3 | 9.91 × 10−3 | 0.04 | 0.09 |
| Soy yogurt | 0.01 | 3 × 10−3 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.03 |
| Soyben edamame | 0.07 | - | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Soybean sprout | 0.03 | 5 × 10−4 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.12 |
Lignan content of cereals (mg/100g food) [18].
| LAR | MAT | MED | SEC | SYR | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereal products | ||||||
| Bread (whole grain flour) | 0.05 | 3.1 × 10−4 | - | 8.68 × 10−3 | - | 0.05 |
| Bread (refined flour) | 0.01 | 1.23 × 10−3 | - | 7.19 × 10−3 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Bread, rye, whole grain flour | 0.01 | 0.02 | - | 0.14 | - | 0.17 |
| Breakfast cereals, bran | 0.01 | 4.87 × 10−3 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.04 |
| Breakfast cereals, corn | - | 1.67 × 10−3 | - | 5.5 × 10−3 | - | 0.007 |
| Breakfast cereals, muesli | 0.14 | 5.6 × 10−3 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.22 |
| Breakfast cereal, oat | - | 0.06 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.08 |
| Pasta | - | 1.85 × 10−3 | - | 2.3 × 10−3 | - | 0.004 |
| Pasta Whole Grain | - | 1.5 × 10−3 | - | 5 × 10−3 | - | 0.006 |
| Cereals | ||||||
| Barley, whole grain flour | 0.08 | 3 × 10−3 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.28 |
| Buckwheat, whole grain flour | 0.36 | 1 × 10−3 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.76 |
| Common wheat, germ | - | 9 × 10−3 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| Common wheat, refined flour | 0.18 | 2.14 × 10−4 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.2 |
| Common wheat, whole grain flour | 0.1 | 9 × 10−4 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.52 |
| Hard wheat, semolin | - | - | - | 2 × 10−3 | - | 0.002 |
| Maize, whole grain | 0.12 | 6.55 × 10−5 | - | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.33 |
| Oat, whole grain flour | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.65 |
| Rye, whole grain flour | 0.32 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
Lignan contents of vegetables (mg/100g food) [18].
| LAR | MAT | MED | SEC | SYR | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabbages | ||||||
| Broccoli | 97.2 | 2.44 × 10−5 | - | 1.31 | - | 98.51 |
| Brussel sprouts | 49.3 | 4 × 10−5 | - | 1.06 | - | 50.36 |
| Cauliflower | 9.31 | 2.4 × 10−5 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 9.48 |
| Collards | 0.06 | 4 × 10−4 | - | 5.9 × 10−3 | - | 0.06 |
| Green cabbage | 0.03 | 3.5 × 10−5 | - | 9.2 × 10−3 | - | 0.03 |
| Red cabbage | 17.8 | 4.44 × 10−5 | - | 0.3 | - | 18.1 |
| White cabbage | 21.2 | - | - | 0.31 | - | 21.51 |
| Kale | 59.9 | 1.2 | - | 1.9 | - | 63 |
| Sauerkraut | 11.6 | - | - | 6.7 | - | 18.3 |
| Fruit vegetales | ||||||
| Avocado | 0.03 | 7.67 × 10−3 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.73 |
| Eggplant purple | 0.05 | - | 7 × 10−3 | 7.79 × 10−3 | 6 × 10−3 | 0.07 |
| Black olive | 0.03 | 5.62 × 10−3 | - | 5.75 × 10−3 | - | 0.04 |
| Green olive | 3.9 × 10−3 | 3.34 × 10−3 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| Green sweet pepper | 12.32 | - | 1 × 10−3 | 0.22 | 4 × 10−3 | 12.54 |
| Red sweet pepper | 7.97 | - | - | 0.24 | - | 8.21 |
| Yellow sweet pepper | 0.07 | - | - | 5.5 × 10−3 | - | 0.07 |
| Tomato (Cherry) | 0.03 | - | 3 × 10−3 | 0.01 | 4.5 × 10−3 | 0.04 |
| Tomato (Whole) | 2.1 | 8.33 × 10−6 | 3.5 × 10−3 | 0.05 | 4.5 × 10−3 | 2.15 |
| Gourds | ||||||
| Cucumber | 3.55 | - | - | 0.25 | - | 3.8 |
| Pumpkin | 0.01 | 2.5 × 10−5 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.11 |
| Squash | - | - | - | 9 × 10−3 | - | 0.009 |
| Zucchini | 6.4 | - | - | 0.62 | - | 7.02 |
| Leaf vegetables | ||||||
| Arugula | - | 2 × 10−4 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
| Chicory (green) | 0.6 | 1.24 × 10−4 | - | 0.57 | - | 1.17 |
| Lettuce (green) | 0.3 | 2.24 × 10−4 | - | 0.18 | - | 0.48 |
| Spinach | 0.06 | 2.37 × 10−5 | - | 4.85 × 10−3 | - | 0.06 |
| Broad bean pod | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| Pod vegetables | ||||||
| Green bean | 22 | - | - | 0.67 | - | 22.67 |
| Pulse vegetables | ||||||
| Fresh pea | 0.05 | - | 3.5 × 10−3 | 7.56 × 10−4 | - | 0.0542 |
| Root vegetables | ||||||
| Carrot | 4.5 | 3.89 × 10−3 | - | 3.16 | - | 7.66 |
| Celeriac | - | 3 × 10−5 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| Parsnip | - | 0.02 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.05 |
| Radish | 0.01 | 1.25 × 10−4 | 5.5 × 10−3 | 6.57 × 10−3 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Swede | - | 7.43 × 10−5 | - | 4.93 × 10−3 | - | 0.005 |
| Turnip root | 0.1 | - | 4 × 10−3 | 9.83 × 10−3 | 0.03 | 0.14 |
| Shoot vegetables | ||||||
| Asparagus | 0.07 | 3.97 × 10−3 | 4 × 10−3 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.37 |
| Fennel | - | 0.01 | - | 0.05 | - | 0.06 |
| Stalks vegetables | ||||||
| Celery stalks | - | - | - | 5.99 × 10−3 | - | 0.005 |
| Tubers | ||||||
| Potato | 2.8 | 7.69 × 10−4 | - | 0.09 | - | 2.89 |
| Sweet potato | 0.07 | 0.1 | - | 0.12 | - | 0.29 |
Lignan contents of fruits berries (mg/100g food) [18].
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Fruit Berries | ||||||
| Bilberry | - | - | - | 6.24 × 10−3 | 0.04 | 0.09 |
| Blackberry | - | - | - | 7.96 × 10−3 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Blackcurrant | - | - | - | 0.01 | 7.3 × 10−3 | 0.01 |
| Cloudberry | - | - | - | - | 0.65 | 0.25 |
| Black grape | - | - | - | - | 5.2 | - |
| Green grape | - | - | - | - | 1.88 | - |
| Lingonberry | - | - | 1.04 × 10−3 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Strawberry | 8.55 × 10−4 | 4.59 × 10−4 | 9.45 × 10−3 | 0.01 | 5.87 | 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Bilberry | - | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.4 |
| Blackberry | 9.07 × 10−4 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.77 |
| Blackcurrant | 1.47 × 10−3 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.03 | - | 0.15 |
| Cloudberry | - | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.41 | 1.85 |
| Black grape | 0.11 | - | 0.09 | - | - | 5.4 |
| Green grape | 0.09 | - | 0.28 | - | - | 2.25 |
| Lingonberry | - | 0.23 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.83 |
| Strawberry | 1.58 × 10−5 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 6.2 |
Lignan contents of fruits (mg/100g food) [18].
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Fruits Citrus | ||||||
| Grapefruit | 7.13 | 0.05 | - | 0.26 | - | 7.44 |
| Lemon | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| Orange | 2.4 | 0.05 | 9.5 × 10−3 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 2.71 |
| Tangerine | 5.7 | 0.02 | - | 0.08 | - | 5.8 |
| Fruits Drupes | ||||||
| Apricot | 10.5 | 3.11 × 10−5 | - | 1.07 | - | 11.57 |
| Nectarine | 4.1 | - | - | 0.61 | - | 4.71 |
| Peach | 6 | 1.71 × 10−4 | - | 0.83 | - | 6.83 |
| Plum | 0.31 | 2.22 × 10−4 | 1 × 10−3 | 0.09 | - | 0.4 |
| Fruits-Gourds | ||||||
| Cantaloupe | 1.8 × 10−3 | - | - | 4.7 × 10−3 | - | 0.006 |
| Melon | 4.4 | 1.05 × 10−5 | - | 0.09 | - | 4.49 |
| Watermelon | 0.04 | - | 1 × 10−3 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| Fruits-Pomes | ||||||
| Apple | 0.1 | 2.71 × 10−5 | - | 1.79 × 10−3 | - | 0.1 |
| Pear | 15.5 | 4.3 × 10−5 | - | 0.06 | - | 15.56 |
| Fruits-Tropical | ||||||
| Banana | 2.2 × 10−3 | 5.45 × 10−5 | - | 7.73 × 10−5 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Kiwi | 1.03 | 1.93 × 10−3 | 4.5 × 10−3 | 3.13 | 4 × 10−3 | 4.17 |
| Mango | - | 1.06 × 10−3 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.01 |
| Passion fruit | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| Papaya | - | 2 × 10−3 | - | - | - | 0.002 |
| Persimmon | - | - | - | 4 × 10−3 | - | 0.004 |
| Pineapple | 0.2 | 0.16 | 2 × 10−3 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.66 |
| Pomegranate | - | 9 × 10−3 | - | 0.29 | - | 0.29 |
Lignan content of beverages (mg/100g drink and mg/100 mL wine) [18].
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Alcoholic Beverages | ||||||
| Red Wine | 0.07 | 7.56 × 10−3 | 5.51 × 10−3 | 0.04 | 3.43 × 10−3 | 0.12 |
| White Wine | 0.03 | 6.65 × 10−3 | 2.68 × 10−3 | 7.45 × 10−3 | 1.45 × 10−3 | 0.04 |
| Dark Beer | - | - | - | 0.04 | - | 0.04 |
| Beer | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 0.03 |
| Cider | - | - | - | 0.04 | - | 0.04 |
| Scotch whisky | - | - | - | 4 × 10−3 | - | 0.004 |
| Sherry | - | - | - | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
| Non-alcoholic Beverages | ||||||
| Cocoa | - | - | - | 0.03 | - | 0.03 |
| Coffee | - | 9 × 10−4 | 4 × 10−4 | 8.67 × 10−3 | - | 0.009 |
| Decaffeinated Coffe | - | 1.1 × 10−3 | 4.25 × 10−4 | 8.35 × 10−3 | - | 0.009 |
| Roman camomile | - | - | 5 × 10−4 | 1 × 10−3 | - | 0.001 |
| Lemon juice | - | - | - | 2 × 10−3 | - | 0.002 |
| Orange juice | - | 2 × 10−4 | - | 8 × 10−3 | - | 0.008 |
| Soy milk | - | 6.17 × 10−3 | 5 × 10−5 | 2.25 × 10−3 | - | 0.008 |
| Black Tea | - | 2 × 10−4 | 2.65 × 10−3 | 0.03 | - | 0.03 |
| Green Tea | - | 1 × 10−4 | 3.38 × 10−3 | 0.03 | - | 0.03 |
| Oolong Tea | - | - | 1.8 × 10−3 | 0.02 | - | 0.02 |
Lignan content of oils (mg/100 g food) [18].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Extra virgin Olive Oil | 0.66 | 3.43 × 10−3 | 7.5 × 10−5 | 0.42 | 2.5 × 10−4 | 1.08 | ||
| Nut oils | ||||||||
| Peanut, butter | - | 8.8 × 10−3 | 7.52 × 10−3 | - | 0.05 | 0.06 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sesame seed oil | 192.6 | 51.97 | 420.99 | 305.43 | 24.92 | 243.13 | 55.71 | 1294.75 |
| Sesame seed black oil | - | - | 644.5 | 226.92 | 21.55 | 287.33 | 43 | 1223.3 |
1-Acetoxypinoresinol (ACE), Episesamin (EPI), Episesaminol (EPL), Pinoresinol (PIN), Sesamol (SEO), Sesamolinol (SEL).
Figure 3Chemical structure of enterodiol (A) and enterolactone (B).
Association between naturally lignan-rich foods and health promotion.
| Author, Year | Methods | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer | ||
| Lowcock, E.C. et al. (2013) [ | Case-control study (2999 cases and 3370 controls) | Consumption of flaxseed and flax bread was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer risk (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.97; and OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67–0.89), respectively. |
| McCann et al. (2012) [ | Case-control study (638 cases and 611 controls) BioRepository at Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Lignan intakes were inversely associated with risk of ER (−) breast cancer among premenopausal women (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.44) and particularly triple negative tumors (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.62). |
| Zaineddin AK et al. (2012) [ | Case-control study (2884 cases and 5509 controls) | High and low consumption of soybeans, as well as of sunflower and pumpkin seeds were associated with significantly reduced breast cancer risk compared to no consumption (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.97; and OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.77–0.97, respectively). |
| Buck K et al. (2011) [ | 1140 postmenopausal patients (age 50 to 74 years) | Serum enterolactone was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death only for estrogen receptor-negative tumors (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.87) |
| Buck K et al. (2010) [ | Meta-analyses Medline search to identify epidemiologic studies published between 1997 and August 2009 | Lignan exposure was not associated with overall breast cancer risk (RE 0.92; 95% CI 0.81, 1.02). |
| McCann, S.E et al. (2010) [ | Breast cancer patients; National Death Index | Lignan intake among post-menopausal women with breast cancer significantly reduced risk of mortality from breast cancer (HR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.11–0.76), as well as significantly reducing risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.91). |
| Velentzis LS et al. (2009) [ | Meta-analy sesMedline, BIOSIS and EMBASE databases publications up to 30 September 2008 | Overall, there was little association between high plant lignan intake and breast cancer risk (11 studies, OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83–1.03). |
| Cotterchio, M et al. (2008) [ | Ontario Cancer Registry; Controls: Age-stratified random sample of women | Total phytoestrogen intake in pre-menopausal women was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer risk among overweight women (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30, 0.87). |
| Suzuki, R. et al. (2008) [ | Swedish Mammography Cohort | A significant 17% risk reduction for breast cancer overall in high lignan intake was observed, but no heterogeneity across Estrogen Receptor/Progesterone Receptor subtypes. |
| Trock BJ et al. (2006) [ | Meta-analysis of 18 epidemiologic studies | High soy intake was discreetly associated with reduction of breast cancer risk (OR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.99); association was not statistically significant among women in Asian countries (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.12). |
| Gastroesophageal Cancer | ||
| Lin Y et al. (2012) [ | Case-control study (1995–1997); 806 controls, 181 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma, 255 cases of gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma, and 158 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. | No clear associations were found between risk of esophageal carcinoma and lignan intake. |
| Lin Y et al. (2012) [ | Cohort study in Sweden, 81,670 (followed up 1998 to 2009). Cancer cases: Swedish Cancer Register | There was no statistically significant association between dietary intake of lignans and any of the studied adenocarcinomas. |
| Colon Cancer | ||
| Zamora-Ros, R. et al. (2015) [ | 409 CRC cases in Barcelona (Spain). | No associations were also observed with either total lignans or any flavonoid subclass intake. |
| Prostate Cancer | ||
| Wallström P et al. (2018) [ | Case-control study (1010 cases and 1817 controls) | There were no significant associations between plasma enterolactone and incidence of prostate cancer (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.77–1.280) |
| Eriksen AK et al. (2017) [ | 1390 men diagnosed with prostate cancer from the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort | No associations between plasma enterolactone concentrations and prostate cancer aggressiveness. |
| Hedelin M et al. (2006) [ | Swedish case-control study (1499 prostate cancer cases and 1130 controls) | No association was found between dietary intake of total or individual lignans or isoflavonoids and risk of prostate cancer. |
| Bylund A. et al. (2003) [ | 10 men with prostate cancer were randomized to a daily supplement of rye bran bread and 8 men of wheat bread | In the rye group, there was a significant increase in plasma enterolactone. However, only small changes were observed in plasma concentrations of prostate specific antigen (PSA). |
| Cardiovascular disease | ||
| Witkowska AM et al. (2018) [ | 2599 postmenopausal women, participants of the Multi-center National Population Health Examination Surveys. | In postmenopausal women, total and individual lignan intakes (secoisolariciresinol, pinoresinol, matairesinol) were not associated with the prevalence of CVD and its risk factors. |
| Pellegrini N et al. (2010) [ | Cross-sectional study in 151 men and 91 post-menopausal women. | No relationship between intake of pinoresinol, lariciresinol or total lignans and sICAM-1 values was observed. |
| Jacobs DR. et al. (2000) [ | 11,040 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Iowa Women’s Health Study Followed from baseline 1986−997. | Women who consumed on average 1.9 g refined grain fiber/2000 kcal and 4.7 g whole grain fiber/2000 kcal had a 17% lower mortality rate (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73–0.94) than women who consumed predominantly refined grain fiber. |
| Vanharanta M. et al. (2003) [ | A prospective study of Finnish men. 1889 men aged 42 to 60 years. Followed up 12.2 years. | Multivariate analyses showed significant associations between elevated serum enterolactone concentration and reduced risk of CVD-related mortality. |
| Other diseases | ||
| Franco OH. et al. (2005) [ | Community-based survey among 394 postmenopausal women. | Increasing dietary lignans intake was associated with better performance on the MMSE (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.94–2.38). Results were most pronounced in women who were 20–30 years. |
| Eichholzer M. et al. (2014) [ | 2028 participants of NHANES 2005-2008 and 2628 participants of NHANES 1999-2004 (aged ≥18 years) | Statistically significant inverse associations of urinary lignan, enterodiol, and enterolactone concentrations with circulating CRP counts were observed in the multivariate-adjusted models. |
FFQ: Food Frequency Questionnaire; CI: Confidence Interval; HR: Hazard Ratio; OR: Odds Ratio; CVD: Cardiovascular Disease; MMSE: Cognitive function Mini-Mental Examination; CRP: C-Reactive Protein.