Kristen M Roberts1, Elizabeth M Grainger2, Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner2, Alice Hinton3, Junnan Gu1, Ken Riedl2,4,5, Yael Vodovotz2,4, Ronney Abaza6,7, Steven J Schwartz2,4,5, Steven K Clinton2,5,8. 1. Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 3. Division of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 5. Nutrient and Phytochemical Analytic Shared Resource, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 7. Ohio Health Physician Group Robotic Urologic and Cancer Surgery, Dublin Methodist Hospital, 7450 Hospital Drive, Suite 300, Dublin, OH, 8518 43016, USA. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract
SCOPE: Black raspberry (BRB) phytochemicals demonstrate anti-carcinogenic properties in experimental models, including prostate cancer. Two BRB foods, a confection and nectar, providing a consistent and reproducible product for human clinical studies are designed and characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Men with clinically localized prostate cancer are sequentially enrolled to a control group or one of four intervention groups (confection or nectar, 10 or 20 g dose; n = 8 per group) for 4 weeks prior to prostatectomy. Primary outcomes include: safety, adherence, and ellagitannin metabolism. Adherence to the intervention is >96%. No significant (≥grade II) toxicities are detected. Urinary urolithins (A, B, C, and D) and dimethyl ellagic acid (DMEA) quantified by Ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC/MS/MS) indicate a dose-dependent excretion yet heterogeneous patterns among men. Men in the BRB confection groups have greater urinary excretion of the microbial urinary metabolites urolithin A and DMEA, suggesting that this food matrix provides greater colonic microflora exposure. CONCLUSION: Fully characterized BRB confections and nectar are ideal for food-based large phase III human clinical studies. BRB products provide a bioavailable source of BRB phytochemicals, however large inter individual variation in polyphenol metabolism suggests that host genetics, microflora, and other factors are critical to understanding bioactivity and metabolism.
SCOPE: Black raspberry (BRB) phytochemicals demonstrate anti-carcinogenic properties in experimental models, including prostate cancer. Two BRB foods, a confection and nectar, providing a consistent and reproducible product for human clinical studies are designed and characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Men with clinically localized prostate cancer are sequentially enrolled to a control group or one of four intervention groups (confection or nectar, 10 or 20 g dose; n = 8 per group) for 4 weeks prior to prostatectomy. Primary outcomes include: safety, adherence, and ellagitannin metabolism. Adherence to the intervention is >96%. No significant (≥grade II) toxicities are detected. Urinary urolithins (A, B, C, and D) and dimethyl ellagic acid (DMEA) quantified by Ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC/MS/MS) indicate a dose-dependent excretion yet heterogeneous patterns among men. Men in the BRB confection groups have greater urinary excretion of the microbial urinary metabolites urolithin A and DMEA, suggesting that this food matrix provides greater colonic microflora exposure. CONCLUSION: Fully characterized BRB confections and nectar are ideal for food-based large phase III human clinical studies. BRB products provide a bioavailable source of BRB phytochemicals, however large inter individual variation in polyphenol metabolism suggests that host genetics, microflora, and other factors are critical to understanding bioactivity and metabolism.
Authors: Allan J Pantuck; John T Leppert; Nazy Zomorodian; William Aronson; Jenny Hong; R James Barnard; Navindra Seeram; Harley Liker; Hejing Wang; Robert Elashoff; David Heber; Michael Aviram; Louis Ignarro; Arie Belldegrun Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Li-Shu Wang; Carol A Burke; Henrietta Hasson; Chieh-Ti Kuo; Christine L Sardo Molmenti; Claire Seguin; Pengyuan Liu; Tim H-M Huang; Wendy L Frankel; Gary D Stoner Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2014-04-24
Authors: Pedro Aguilar-Zarate; Jorge E Wong-Paz; Juan J Buenrostro-Figueroa; Juan A Ascacio; Juan C Contreras-Esquivel; Cristóbal N Aguilar Journal: Mini Rev Med Chem Date: 2018 Impact factor: 3.862
Authors: Navindra P Seeram; William J Aronson; Yanjun Zhang; Susanne M Henning; Aune Moro; Ru-Po Lee; Maryam Sartippour; Diane M Harris; Matthew Rettig; Marc A Suchard; Allan J Pantuck; Arie Belldegrun; David Heber Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Rocío García-Villalba; David Beltrán; Juan Carlos Espín; María Victoria Selma; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Francisco A Tomás-Barberán; Rocío García-Villalba; Antonio González-Sarrías; María V Selma; Juan C Espín Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: María A Nuñez-Sánchez; Rocío García-Villalba; Tamara Monedero-Saiz; Noelia V García-Talavera; María B Gómez-Sánchez; Carmen Sánchez-Álvarez; Ana M García-Albert; Francisco J Rodríguez-Gil; Miguel Ruiz-Marín; Francisco A Pastor-Quirante; Francisco Martínez-Díaz; María J Yáñez-Gascón; Antonio González-Sarrías; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán; Juan C Espín Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2014-02-16 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Susan R Mallery; Jared C Zwick; Ping Pei; Meng Tong; Peter E Larsen; Brian S Shumway; Bo Lu; Henry W Fields; Russell J Mumper; Gary D Stoner Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701