Literature DB >> 30838405

Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

Maria-Athina Altzerinakou, Laurence Collette, Xavier Paoletti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the era of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), it is recommended to account for toxicity over several cycles to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). We investigated the relationship between the risk of toxicity at cycle 1 and the cumulative incidence of toxicity over subsequent cycles in trials of single MTAs.
METHODS: On individual patient data from 26 phase I clinical trials of single MTAs provided by the National Cancer Institute, we estimated the probability of first-severe toxicity per treatment cycle as well as the cumulative incidence at, below, and above the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Toxicity was further subclassified into nonhematologic and hematologic. A prediction table was developed to estimate the cumulative incidence up to six cycles based on the toxicity rate observed in the first cycle.
RESULTS: Overall, 942 patients were included. For patients treated at the MTD, the probability of first-severe toxicity decreased from 24.8% (95% prediction interval [PI] = 20.3% to 32.9%) to 2.2% (95% PI = 0.1% to 7.7%) from cycle 1 to 6, whereas the cumulative incidence of toxicity reached 51.7% (95% PI = 40.5% to 66.3%) after six cycles. Toxicity rates ranging from 20.0% to 30.0% in the first cycle were associated with 46.8% (95% PI = 39.5% to 54.2%) and 65.8% (95% PI = 57.7% to 73.1%) cumulative incidence after six cycles.
CONCLUSION: This study examined the risk of severe toxicity over time of single MTAs. The cumulative incidence of toxicity at the MTD was higher than the usually accepted toxicity targets, challenging the definition of the RP2D of MTAs. The prediction table may help calibrate the target rate at the RP2D.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838405      PMCID: PMC6855968          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  24 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra Mandrekar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Endpoints and other considerations in phase I studies of targeted anticancer therapy: recommendations from the task force on Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT).

Authors:  Christopher M Booth; A Hilary Calvert; Giuseppe Giaccone; Marinus W Lobbezoo; Lesley K Seymour; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.

Authors:  Marie-Karelle Riviere; Ying Yuan; Jacques-Henri Jourdan; Frédéric Dubois; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Christopher Tait
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ick Hoon Jin; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  R Simon; B Freidlin; L Rubinstein; S G Arbuck; J Collins; M C Christian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-08-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph S Koopmeiners; Jaime Modiano
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.