Literature DB >> 16220478

An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.

Wei Zhang1, Daniel J Sargent, Sumithra Mandrekar.   

Abstract

Novel therapies are challenging the standards of drug development. Agents with specific biologic targets and limited toxicity require novel designs to determine doses to be taken forward into larger studies. In this paper, we describe an approach that incorporates both toxicity and efficacy data into the estimation of the biologically optimal dose of an agent in a phase I trial. The approach is based on the flexible continuation-ratio model, and uses straightforward optimal dose selection criteria. Dose selection is based on all patients treated up until that time point, using a continual reassessment method approach. Dose-outcome curves considered include monotonically increasing, monotonically decreasing, and unimodal curves. Our simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed design, which we call TriCRM, has favourable operating characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16220478     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  59 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 2.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  A decision-theoretic phase I-II design for ordinal outcomes in two cycles.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Yuan Ji; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Application of Adaptive DP-optimality to Design a Pilot Study for a Clotting Time Test for Enoxaparin.

Authors:  Abhishek Gulati; James M Faed; Geoffrey K Isbister; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

Authors:  Maria-Athina Altzerinakou; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  A trivariate continual reassessment method for phase I/II trials of toxicity, efficacy, and surrogate efficacy.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Differential Posttreatment Outcomes of Methylphenidate for Smoking Cessation for Individuals With ADHD.

Authors:  Sean X Luo; Lirio S Covey; Mei-Chen Hu; Theresa M Winhusen; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2019-09-19

10.  Effective sample size for computing prior hyperparameters in Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Richard C Herrick; Hoang Q Nguyen; John J Venier; J Clift Norris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.