Literature DB >> 21444876

Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Sophie Postel-Vinay1, Carlos Gomez-Roca, L Rhoda Molife, Bhavesh Anghan, Antonin Levy, Ian Judson, Johann De Bono, Jean-Charles Soria, Stan Kaye, Xavier Paoletti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Phase I trials traditionally aim at determining the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) using grade ≥ 3 toxicity data from cycle 1 (C1) only. This design dates from the era of conventional chemotherapy and may not be relevant for new molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) usually administered in a chronic fashion and for which late or moderate toxicities may deserve particular attention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients treated in phase I trials of MTAs at the Royal Marsden Hospital and Institut Gustave Roussy between January 2005 and July 2008 were included. Gastrointestinal, skin, and clinical renal toxicities of any grade and grades 3 to 4 toxic events of any type occurring at any cycle on treatment were recorded. Doses administered, treatment interruptions, dose modifications, and prescription of comedications were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 445 patients (1,566 cycles; median treatment duration, 55 days) were included in 36 eligible trials; 790 toxicities (590, grade 1; 176, grade, 2; 24 grades, 3 to 4) and 1,819 toxicities (1,521, grade 1; 265, grade 2; 33, grades 3 to 4) were recorded during and after C1, respectively; 57% of the grades 3 to 4 toxicities occurred after C1; 50% of patients presented their worst-grade toxicity after C1. The risk of grades 3 to 4 toxicity was 3% in cycles 1 to 6 and was almost null afterwards. No cumulative toxicities were observed. Median toxicity duration was 15 days, with comedication administered in 68% of events.
CONCLUSION: Moderate and severe toxicities occur regularly after the first cycle in phase I trials of MTAs and may deserve increased attention in the RP2D process for these agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444876     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

1.  Identification of high-risk drugs related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored phase I trials.

Authors:  Shun Kishimoto; Nobu Oshima; Matthew Rinker; Murali C Krishna; Naoko Takebe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Measuring the symptom burden associated with the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Loretta A Williams; Araceli G Garcia Gonzalez; Patricia Ault; Tito R Mendoza; Mary L Sailors; Janet L Williams; Furong Huang; Aziz Nazha; Hagop M Kantarjian; Charles S Cleeland; Jorge E Cortes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Beyond the dose-limiting toxicity period: Dermatologic adverse events of patients on phase 1 trials of the Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program.

Authors:  Alexander Drilon; Anne A Eaton; Katja Schindler; Mrinal M Gounder; David R Spriggs; Pamela Harris; S Percy Ivy; Alexia Iasonos; Mario E Lacouture; David M Hyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Rui Qin; Monia Ezzalfani; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

Authors:  Maria-Athina Altzerinakou; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of phase I/II targeted therapy combined with radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: quality of report, toxicity, and survival.

Authors:  Marcos A dos Santos; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Pierre Blanchard; Delphine Lefeuvre; Antonin Levy; Mehdi Touat; Guillaume Louvel; Frédéric Dhermain; Jean-Charles Soria; Eric Deutsch; Gwénaël Le Teuff
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  A Bayesian Dose-finding Design for Drug Combination Trials with Delayed Toxicities.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Jing Ning
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.728

8.  Case Example of Dose Optimization Using Data From Bortezomib Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Daniel Backenroth; Ying Kuen Ken Cheung; Dawn L Hershman; Diana Vulih; Barry Anderson; Percy Ivy; Lori Minasian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Model-Assisted Designs for Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Simplicity Meets Superiority.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

10.  Estimating global treatment toxicity burden from adverse-event data.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Dawn L Hershman; Jieling Miao; Xiaobo Zhong; Joseph M Unger; Ying Kuen Ken Cheung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.