Literature DB >> 26988926

Phase I/II dose-finding design for molecularly targeted agent: Plateau determination using adaptive randomization.

Marie-Karelle Riviere1,2, Ying Yuan3, Jacques-Henri Jourdan4, Frédéric Dubois2, Sarah Zohar1.   

Abstract

Conventionally, phase I dose-finding trials aim to determine the maximum tolerated dose of a new drug under the assumption that both toxicity and efficacy monotonically increase with the dose. This paradigm, however, is not suitable for some molecularly targeted agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, for which efficacy often increases initially with the dose and then plateaus. For molecularly targeted agents, the goal is to find the optimal dose, defined as the lowest safe dose that achieves the highest efficacy. We develop a Bayesian phase I/II dose-finding design to find the optimal dose. We employ a logistic model with a plateau parameter to capture the increasing-then-plateau feature of the dose-efficacy relationship. We take the weighted likelihood approach to accommodate for the case where efficacy is possibly late-onset. Based on observed data, we continuously update the posterior estimates of toxicity and efficacy probabilities and adaptively assign patients to the optimal dose. The simulation studies show that the proposed design has good operating characteristics. This method is going to be applied in more than two phase I clinical trials as no other method is available for this specific setting. We also provide an R package dfmta that can be downloaded from CRAN website.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-finding; molecularly targeted agents; oncology; phase I; phase II

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26988926     DOI: 10.1177/0962280216631763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  7 in total

1.  Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

Authors:  Maria-Athina Altzerinakou; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Generalization of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to bivariate outcomes.

Authors:  Donglin Yan; Christopher Tait; Nolan A Wages; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Emily V Dressler
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  An information theoretic phase I-II design for molecularly targeted agents that does not require an assumption of monotonicity.

Authors:  Pavel Mozgunov; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  A flexible design for advanced Phase I/II clinical trials with continuous efficacy endpoints.

Authors:  Pavel Mozgunov; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  CFO: Calibration-free odds design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Huaqing Jin; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.494

6.  Interval design to identify the optimal biological dose for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yeonhee Park
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-09-24

Review 7.  Master protocols in immuno-oncology: do novel drugs deserve novel designs?

Authors:  Luca Mazzarella; Stefania Morganti; Antonio Marra; Dario Trapani; Giulia Tini; Piergiuseppe Pelicci; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 13.751

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.