Rajkumar Thangaraj1, Jan Kuiper2,3, Ralph D Perkins1. 1. Princess Royal Hospital, Telford, United Kingdom. 2. ISTM, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, United Kingdom. 3. Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oswestry, United Kingdom.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: 40 mm large diameter heads offer the advantages of lesser dislocation rates and better stability while highly cross linked polyethylene have lower wear rates than ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Studies of the survivorship of 40 mm heads in hybrid hip replacements with Exeter stem and second generation highly cross linked polyethylene are limited. The purpose of the study is to report the short term of survivorship of the large diameter heads (40 mm) with Exeter stem with the secondary aim being the survival analysis of the thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene. METHODS: Retrospective case series of survivorship of patients with hybrid hip replacements of Exeter stems with 40 mm heads articulating with second generation triple annealed highly cross linked polyethylene liner on a uncemented acetabular shell was performed. As a subset, survival of thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene survival (3.8 mm) at short term was assessed. Survival of the implants was confirmed from the hospital records and National joint registry as of 2015. Revision for any cause was taken as end point. RESULTS: 324 hybrid hip replacements with 40 mm heads had been performed for primary hip osteoarthritis. Of the 324 hip replacements, 154 hip replacements had thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene (3.8 mm). Two patients had revision of components, one for periprosthetic fracture and one for deep infection. Mean age of the patients was 70.5 years (range 42-88 years, median 71, SD 8.3 years). None of the patients had revision due to trunion wear or loosening of components. The overall 5-year implant survival probability of hips with 40 mm heads was 99.4% (95% CI 98 to 100%) while the subset group of hip replacements with thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene (3.8 mm) had 5-year implant survival probability of 99.3% (95% CI 97.1 to 100%). CONCLUSION: Short term survivorship does not show significant evidence of early failure or higher rate of revision in our series of hybrid hip replacements with large diameter heads and second generation triple annealed highly cross linked polyethylene. Dislocation rate at the short term is none. Results from this series have to be carefully interpreted due to the relatively short follow up but so far results are encouraging. Long term follow up is required to conclude whether there is early or higher rate of failure. It is our intention to follow up this cohort and further publish our results at longer term.
INTRODUCTION: 40 mm large diameter heads offer the advantages of lesser dislocation rates and better stability while highly cross linked polyethylene have lower wear rates than ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Studies of the survivorship of 40 mm heads in hybrid hip replacements with Exeter stem and second generation highly cross linked polyethylene are limited. The purpose of the study is to report the short term of survivorship of the large diameter heads (40 mm) with Exeter stem with the secondary aim being the survival analysis of the thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene. METHODS: Retrospective case series of survivorship of patients with hybrid hip replacements of Exeter stems with 40 mm heads articulating with second generation triple annealed highly cross linked polyethylene liner on a uncemented acetabular shell was performed. As a subset, survival of thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene survival (3.8 mm) at short term was assessed. Survival of the implants was confirmed from the hospital records and National joint registry as of 2015. Revision for any cause was taken as end point. RESULTS: 324 hybrid hip replacements with 40 mm heads had been performed for primary hip osteoarthritis. Of the 324 hip replacements, 154 hip replacements had thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene (3.8 mm). Two patients had revision of components, one for periprosthetic fracture and one for deep infection. Mean age of the patients was 70.5 years (range 42-88 years, median 71, SD 8.3 years). None of the patients had revision due to trunion wear or loosening of components. The overall 5-year implant survival probability of hips with 40 mm heads was 99.4% (95% CI 98 to 100%) while the subset group of hip replacements with thinnest second generation highly cross linked polyethylene (3.8 mm) had 5-year implant survival probability of 99.3% (95% CI 97.1 to 100%). CONCLUSION: Short term survivorship does not show significant evidence of early failure or higher rate of revision in our series of hybrid hip replacements with large diameter heads and second generation triple annealed highly cross linked polyethylene. Dislocation rate at the short term is none. Results from this series have to be carefully interpreted due to the relatively short follow up but so far results are encouraging. Long term follow up is required to conclude whether there is early or higher rate of failure. It is our intention to follow up this cohort and further publish our results at longer term.
Entities:
Keywords:
Highly cross linked polyethylene; Large diameter heads; Low failure; Revision; Second generation HCLPE; Sequentially processed polyethylene
Authors: John H Dumbleton; James A D'Antonio; Michael T Manley; William N Capello; Aiguo Wang Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: C Van Sikes; Lawrence P Lai; Martin Schreiber; Michael A Mont; Riyaz H Jinnah; Thorsten M Seyler Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Brian R Burroughs; Orhun K Muratoglu; Charles R Bragdon; Keith K Wannomae; Steven Christensen; Andrew J Lozynsky; William H Harris Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Jeffrey A Geller; Henrik Malchau; Charles Bragdon; Meridith Greene; William H Harris; Andrew A Freiberg Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Georgios Digas; Johan Kärrholm; Jonas Thanner; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Paul F Lachiewicz; Daniel S Heckman; Elizabeth S Soileau; Jimmi Mangla; John M Martell Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 4.176