Literature DB >> 19507982

Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.

Douglas S Brungart1, Peter S Chang, Brian D Simpson, DeLiang Wang.   

Abstract

When a target voice is masked by an increasingly similar masker voice, increases in energetic masking are likely to occur due to increased spectro-temporal overlap in the competing speech waveforms. However, the impact of this increase may be obscured by informational masking effects related to the increased confusability of the target and masking utterances. In this study, the effects of target-masker similarity and the number of competing talkers on the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking were measured with an ideal time-frequency segregation (ITFS) technique that retained all the target-dominated time-frequency regions of a multitalker mixture but eliminated all the time-frequency regions dominated by the maskers. The results show that target-masker similarity has a small but systematic impact on energetic masking, with roughly a 1 dB release from masking for same-sex maskers versus same-talker maskers and roughly an additional 1 dB release from masking for different-sex masking voices. The results of a second experiment measuring ITFS performance with up to 18 interfering talkers indicate that energetic masking increased systematically with the number of competing talkers. These results suggest that energetic masking differences related to target-masker similarity have a much smaller impact on multitalker listening performance than energetic masking effects related to the number of competing talkers in the stimulus and non-energetic masking effects related to the confusability of the target and masking voices.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19507982     DOI: 10.1121/1.3117686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a pediatric Spanish-English speech perception task.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Bianca Gomez; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Lynn Gilbertson; Inseok Heo; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Todd Jennings; Kameron Clayton; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Developmental Effects in Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Perception Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The importance of processing resolution in "ideal time-frequency segregation" of masked speech and the implications for predicting speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Virginia Best; Todd R Jennings; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Paying attention to speech: The role of working memory capacity and professional experience.

Authors:  Bar Lambez; Galit Agmon; Paz Har-Shai Yahav; Yuri Rassovsky; Elana Zion Golumbic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.