Literature DB >> 18177170

The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.

Martin Cooke1, M L Garcia Lecumberri, Jon Barker.   

Abstract

Studies comparing native and non-native listener performance on speech perception tasks can distinguish the roles of general auditory and language-independent processes from those involving prior knowledge of a given language. Previous experiments have demonstrated a performance disparity between native and non-native listeners on tasks involving sentence processing in noise. However, the effects of energetic and informational masking have not been explicitly distinguished. Here, English and Spanish listener groups identified keywords in English sentences in quiet and masked by either stationary noise or a competing utterance, conditions known to produce predominantly energetic and informational masking, respectively. In the stationary noise conditions, non-native talkers suffered more from increasing levels of noise for two of the three keywords scored. In the competing talker condition, the performance differential also increased with masker level. A computer model of energetic masking in the competing talker condition ruled out the possibility that the native advantage could be explained wholly by energetic masking. Both groups drew equal benefit from differences in mean F0 between target and masker, suggesting that processes which make use of this cue do not engage language-specific knowledge.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177170     DOI: 10.1121/1.2804952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  54 in total

1.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Conversational and clear speech intelligibility of /bVd/ syllables produced by native and non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Catherine L Rogers; Teresa M DeMasi; Jean C Krause
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of language experience on digit recognition by English and Chinese listeners.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhou; Wei Yuan; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of Place of Articulation for Plosives and Fricatives in Noise.

Authors:  Abeer Alwan; Jintao Jiang; Willa Chen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  [Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking. German version].

Authors:  S Rählmann; H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking.

Authors:  S Rählmann; H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Influence of depressive symptoms on speech perception in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Kristin Van Engen; Zilong Xie; Christopher G Beevers; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-08-04

10.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.