Literature DB >> 16583901

A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Martin Cooke1.   

Abstract

Do listeners process noisy speech by taking advantage of "glimpses"-spectrotemporal regions in which the target signal is least affected by the background? This study used an automatic speech recognition system, adapted for use with partially specified inputs, to identify consonants in noise. Twelve masking conditions were chosen to create a range of glimpse sizes. Several different glimpsing models were employed, differing in the local signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) used for detection, the minimum glimpse size, and the use of information in the masked regions. Recognition results were compared with behavioral data. A quantitative analysis demonstrated that the proportion of the time-frequency plane glimpsed is a good predictor of intelligibility. Recognition scores in each noise condition confirmed that sufficient information exists in glimpses to support consonant identification. Close fits to listeners' performance were obtained at two local SNR thresholds: one at around 8 dB and another in the range -5 to -2 dB. A transmitted information analysis revealed that cues to voicing are degraded more in the model than in human auditory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16583901     DOI: 10.1121/1.2166600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  152 in total

1.  Phonemic restoration effect reversed in a reverberant room.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of interrupted speech: effects of dual-rate gating on the intelligibility of words and sentences.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Robert Risley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Location and acoustic scale cues in concurrent speech recognition.

Authors:  D Timothy Ives; Martin D Vestergaard; Doris J Kistler; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relative contribution of off- and on-frequency spectral components of background noise to the masking of unprocessed and vocoded speech.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yi Hu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.