Literature DB >> 24853067

Supervised machine learning and active learning in classification of radiology reports.

Dung H M Nguyen1, Jon D Patrick1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents an automated system for classifying the results of imaging examinations (CT, MRI, positron emission tomography) into reportable and non-reportable cancer cases. This system is part of an industrial-strength processing pipeline built to extract content from radiology reports for use in the Victorian Cancer Registry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In addition to traditional supervised learning methods such as conditional random fields and support vector machines, active learning (AL) approaches were investigated to optimize training production and further improve classification performance. The project involved two pilot sites in Victoria, Australia (Lake Imaging (Ballarat) and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Melbourne)) and, in collaboration with the NSW Central Registry, one pilot site at Westmead Hospital (Sydney).
RESULTS: The reportability classifier performance achieved 98.25% sensitivity and 96.14% specificity on the cancer registry's held-out test set. Up to 92% of training data needed for supervised machine learning can be saved by AL. DISCUSSION: AL is a promising method for optimizing the supervised training production used in classification of radiology reports. When an AL strategy is applied during the data selection process, the cost of manual classification can be reduced significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: The most important practical application of the reportability classifier is that it can dramatically reduce human effort in identifying relevant reports from the large imaging pool for further investigation of cancer. The classifier is built on a large real-world dataset and can achieve high performance in filtering relevant reports to support cancer registries. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Radiology Information Systems; active learning; machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24853067      PMCID: PMC4147614          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  9 in total

1.  Automated computer-assisted categorization of radiology reports.

Authors:  Bijoy J Thomas; Hugue Ouellette; Elkan F Halpern; Daniel I Rosenthal
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: validation study.

Authors:  Keith J Dreyer; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Autumn M Hurier; Benjamin A Asfaw; Thomas Schultz; Elkan F Halpern; James H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Optimal training sets for Bayesian prediction of MeSH assignment.

Authors:  Sunghwan Sohn; Won Kim; Donald C Comeau; W John Wilbur
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms (SNOMED CT) to represent computed tomography procedures.

Authors:  Thuppahi Sisira De Silva; Don MacDonald; Grace Paterson; Khokan C Sikdar; Bonnie Cochrane
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Applying active learning to supervised word sense disambiguation in MEDLINE.

Authors:  Yukun Chen; Hongxin Cao; Qiaozhu Mei; Kai Zheng; Hua Xu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling?

Authors:  Rosa L Figueroa; Qing Zeng-Treitler; Long H Ngo; Sergey Goryachev; Eduardo P Wiechmann
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Applying active learning to high-throughput phenotyping algorithms for electronic health records data.

Authors:  Yukun Chen; Robert J Carroll; Eugenia R McPeek Hinz; Anushi Shah; Anne E Eyler; Joshua C Denny; Hua Xu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Collection of cancer stage data by classifying free-text medical reports.

Authors:  Iain A McCowan; Darren C Moore; Anthony N Nguyen; Rayleen V Bowman; Belinda E Clarke; Edwina E Duhig; Mary-Jane Fry
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Discerning tumor status from unstructured MRI reports--completeness of information in existing reports and utility of automated natural language processing.

Authors:  Lionel T E Cheng; Jiaping Zheng; Guergana K Savova; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.056

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Trends in biomedical informatics: automated topic analysis of JAMIA articles.

Authors:  Dong Han; Shuang Wang; Chao Jiang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Hyeon-Eui Kim; Jimeng Sun; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Automatic inference of BI-RADS final assessment categories from narrative mammography report findings.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Selen Bozkurt; Emel Alkim; Hersh Sagreiya; Allison W Kurian; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Intelligent Word Embeddings of Free-Text Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Imon Banerjee; Sriraman Madhavan; Roger Eric Goldman; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

4.  Active deep learning for the identification of concepts and relations in electroencephalography reports.

Authors:  Ramon Maldonado; Sanda M Harabagiu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Improving condition severity classification with an efficient active learning based framework.

Authors:  Nir Nissim; Mary Regina Boland; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Yuval Elovici; George Hripcsak; Yuval Shahar; Robert Moskovitch
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Inter-labeler and intra-labeler variability of condition severity classification models using active and passive learning methods.

Authors:  Nir Nissim; Yuval Shahar; Yuval Elovici; George Hripcsak; Robert Moskovitch
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Classification of radiology reports for falls in an HIV study cohort.

Authors:  Jonathan Bates; Samah J Fodeh; Cynthia A Brandt; Julie A Womack
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Parallel multiple instance learning for extremely large histopathology image analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Yeshu Li; Zhengyang Shen; Ziwei Wu; Teng Gao; Yubo Fan; Maode Lai; Eric I-Chao Chang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  McTwo: a two-step feature selection algorithm based on maximal information coefficient.

Authors:  Ruiquan Ge; Manli Zhou; Youxi Luo; Qinghan Meng; Guoqin Mai; Dongli Ma; Guoqing Wang; Fengfeng Zhou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Interactive phenotyping of large-scale histology imaging data with HistomicsML.

Authors:  Michael Nalisnik; Mohamed Amgad; Sanghoon Lee; Sameer H Halani; Jose Enrique Velazquez Vega; Daniel J Brat; David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.