Literature DB >> 32257128

A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.

Marzieh Esmaeili1,2, Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh1,2, Nasrin Ahmadinejad3,4, Marjan Ghazisaeedi1, Azin Nahvijou5, Keivan Maghooli6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mammography plays a key role in the diagnosis of breast cancer; however, decision-making based on mammography reports is still challenging. This paper aims to addresses the challenges regarding decision-making based on mammography reports and propose a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) using data mining methods to help clinicians to interpret mammography reports.
METHODS: For this purpose, 2441 mammography reports were collected from Imam Khomeini Hospital from March 21, 2018, to March 20, 2019. In the first step, these mammography reports are analyzed and program code is developed to transform the reports into a dataset. Then, the weight of every feature of the dataset is calculated. Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbor (K-NN), Deep Learning classifiers are applied to the dataset to build a model capable of predicting the need for referral to biopsy. Afterward, the models are evaluated using cross-validation with measuring Area Under Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity indices.
RESULTS: The mammography type (diagnostic or screening), mass and calcification features mentioned in the reports are the most important features for decision-making. Results reveal that the K-NN model is the most accurate and specific classifier with the accuracy and specificity values of 84.06% and 84.72% respectively. The Random Forest classifier has the best sensitivity and AUC with the sensitivity and AUC values of 87.74% and 0.905 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Accordingly, data mining approaches are proved to be a helpful tool to make the final decision as to whether patients should be referred to biopsy or not based on mammography reports. The developed CDSS may also be helpful especially for less experienced radiologists. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS; Breast cancer; CDSS; Data mining; Mammography report

Year:  2020        PMID: 32257128      PMCID: PMC7113352          DOI: 10.1007/s13755-020-00109-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst        ISSN: 2047-2501


  34 in total

Review 1.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Neill K J Adhikari; Heather McDonald; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; P J Devereaux; Joseph Beyene; Justina Sam; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Knowledge discovery from structured mammography reports using inductive logic programming.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Jesse Davis; Victor Santos Costa; Inês de Castro Dutra; Charles E Kahn; Jason Fine; David Page
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

3.  Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Jafi A Lipson; Utku Senol; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Proposing New RadLex Terms by Analyzing Free-Text Mammography Reports.

Authors:  Hakan Bulu; Dorothy A Sippo; Janie M Lee; Elizabeth S Burnside; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.

Authors:  C A Beam; P M Layde; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-01-22

6.  A study of factors related to patients' length of stay using data mining techniques in a general hospital in southern Iran.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori; Mehdi Hassaniazad; Tayebeh Baniasadi; Keivan Maghooli; Kobra Kahnouji
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2020-02-01

7.  Transfer learning based histopathologic image classification for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Erkan Deniz; Abdulkadir Şengür; Zehra Kadiroğlu; Yanhui Guo; Varun Bajaj; Ümit Budak
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2018-09-28

8.  Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth Burnside; Mehmet Ayvaci; Jude Shavlik; David Page
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Min       Date:  2009

9.  Automated AJCC (7th edition) staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN).

Authors:  Dipanjan Moitra; Rakesh Kr Mandal
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2019-07-30

10.  Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.

Authors:  J Ferlay; M Colombet; I Soerjomataram; C Mathers; D M Parkin; M Piñeros; A Znaor; F Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.