Literature DB >> 30783881

Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.

Subha Ramani1, Karen D Könings2, Shiphra Ginsburg3, Cees Pm van der Vleuten2.   

Abstract

Feedback is defined as a regulatory mechanism where the effect of an action is fed back to modify and improve future action. In medical education, newer conceptualizations of feedback place the learner at the center of the feedback loop and emphasize learner engagement in the entire process. But, learners reject feedback if they doubt its credibility or it conflicts with their self-assessment. Therefore, attention has turned to sociocultural factors that influence feedback-seeking, acceptance, and incorporation into performance. Understanding and application of specific aspects of psychosocial theories could help in designing initiatives that enhance the effect of feedback on learning and growth. In the end, the quality and impact of feedback should be measured by its influence on recipient behavior change, professional growth, and quality of patient care and not the skills of the feedback provider. Our objective is to compare and contrast older and newer definitions of feedback, explore existing feedback models, and highlight principles of relevant psychosocial theories applicable to feedback initiatives. Finally, we aim to apply principles from patient safety initiatives to emphasize a safe and just culture within which feedback conversations occur so that weaknesses are as readily acknowledged and addressed as strengths.

Entities:  

Keywords:  feedback; feedback credibility; feedback culture; residency education; sociocultural theory

Year:  2019        PMID: 30783881      PMCID: PMC6502935          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04874-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  60 in total

1.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

Authors:  R M Ryan; E L Deci
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings.

Authors:  William T Branch; Anuradha Paranjape
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Serving up the feedback sandwich.

Authors:  Anne Dohrenwend
Journal:  Fam Pract Manag       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

4.  Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback.

Authors:  A Sender Liberman; Moishe Liberman; Yvonne Steinert; Peter McLeod; Sarkis Meterissian
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors.

Authors:  Nancy L Dudek; Meridith B Marks; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Fair and just culture, team behavior, and leadership engagement: The tools to achieve high reliability.

Authors:  Allan S Frankel; Michael W Leonard; Charles R Denham
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  What is feedback in clinical education?

Authors:  J M Monica van de Ridder; Karel M Stokking; William C McGaghie; Olle Th J ten Cate
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant; Karen Mann; Suzanne Ferrier
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant; Karen Mann; Douglas Sinclair; Cees Van der Vleuten; Job Metsemakers
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 3.853

10.  Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant; Karen Mann; Douglas Sinclair; Cees van der Vleuten; Job Metsemakers
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  9 in total

1.  Trust as a Scaffold for Competency-Based Medical Education.

Authors:  Eric Young; D Michael Elnicki
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Bridging the Gap: Using Consensus to Explore Entrustment Decisions and Feedback Receptivity in Competency-Based Emergency Medicine Residency Programs Through the Construction of a Q-Sample Incorporating a Delphi Technique.

Authors:  Yu-Che Chang; Renee S Chuang; Cheng-Ting Hsiao; Madalitso Khwepeya; Nothando S Nkambule
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Rapid Feedback: Assessing Pre-clinical Teaching in the Era of Online Learning.

Authors:  Daniel Walden; Meagan Rawls; Sally A Santen; Moshe Feldman; Anna Vinnikova; Alan Dow
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 4.  The Use of Feedback in Improving the Knowledge, Attitudes and Skills of Medical Students: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Margareth Alves Bastos E Castro; Regina Lúcia Muniz de Almeida; Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti; Sandra Helena Cerrato Tibiriçá; Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel; Giancarlo Lucchetti
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-10-18

5.  Principles of Effective Educational Feedback: A Pictorial Epilog.

Authors:  Rajiv Mahajan
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2021-01-26

6.  Culture and understanding the role of feedback for health professions students: realist synthesis protocol.

Authors:  Paul Douglas Fullerton; Mahbub Sarkar; Shamsul Haque; Wendy McKenzie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  It's a 'two-way street': resident perspectives of effective coaching relationships in the clinical learning environment.

Authors:  Jessica Trier; Jennifer Turnnidge; Cailie S McGuire; Jean Côté; J Damon Dagnone
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2022-07-06

8.  Assessment of core teaching competency of health professional educators in Ethiopia: an institution-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Daniel Dejene; Jelle Stekelenburg; Marco Versluis; Firew Ayalew; Yohannes Molla
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Impact of a work-based feedback intervention on student performance during clinical placements in acute-care healthcare settings: a quasi-experimental protocol for the REMARK programme.

Authors:  Christine Ossenberg; Marion Mitchell; Amanda Henderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.006

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.