Literature DB >> 12480619

Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings.

William T Branch1, Anuradha Paranjape.   

Abstract

Feedback and reflection are two basic teaching methods used in clinical settings. In this article, the authors explore the distinctions between, and the potential impact of, feedback and reflection in clinical teaching. Feedback is the heart of medical education; different teaching encounters call for different types of feedback. Although most clinicians are familiar with the principles of giving feedback, many clinicians probably do not recognize the many opportunities presented to them for using feedback as a teaching tool. Reflection in medicine-the consideration of the larger context, the meaning, and the implications of an experience and action-allows the assimilation and reordering of concepts, skills, knowledge, and values into pre-existing knowledge structures. When used well, reflection will promote the growth of the individual. While feedback is not used often enough, reflection is probably used even less.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12480619     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  83 in total

Review 1.  Fostering professionalism in medical education: a call for improved assessment and meaningful incentives.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Virginia A Reed; G Christian Jernstedt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  [Mandatory elective course in emergency medicine with instructions by paramedics improves practical training in undergraduate medical education].

Authors:  F Walcher; M Rüsseler; F Nürnberger; C Byhahn; M Stier; J Mrosek; M Weinlich; R Breitkreutz; F Heringer; I Marzi
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process.

Authors:  Paul Haidet; Howard F Stein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  The Foundation Programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees?

Authors:  S Carr
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Proposal for a collaborative approach to clinical teaching.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Mark C Lee
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  The self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective.

Authors:  Erik Driessen; Jan van Tartwijk; Tim Dornan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-12

7.  Giving feedback on clinical skills: are we starving our young?

Authors:  Peter A M Anderson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-06

8.  Let's Talk about the Talk: Exploring the Experience of Discussing Student Performance at the Mid- and Final Points of the Clinical Internship.

Authors:  Jacqueline Yeldon; Rose Wilson; Jacqueline Laferrière; Gillian Arseneau; ShanShan Gu BSc; Mark Hall; Kathleen E Norman; Karen Yoshida; Brenda Mori
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

9.  Residents' use of case-based reflection exercises.

Authors:  Cheri Bethune; Judith Belle Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Incorporating and evaluating an integrated gender-specific medicine curriculum: a survey study in Dutch GP training.

Authors:  Patrick W Dielissen; Ben J A M Bottema; Petra Verdonk; Toine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.