| Literature DB >> 30679952 |
Federica Tomao1, Anna Di Pinto1, Carolina Maria Sassu1, Erlisa Bardhi1, Violante Di Donato1, Ludovico Muzii1, Maria Cristina Petrella2, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori2, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici1.
Abstract
A considerable number of patients with a cancer diagnosis are of childbearing age and have not satisfied their desire for a family. Despite ovarian cancer (OC) usually occurring in older patients, 3%-14% are diagnosed at a fertile age with the overall 5-year survival rate being 91.2% in women ≤44 years of age when it is found at 1A-B stage. In this scenario, testing the safety and the efficacy of fertility sparing strategies in OC patients is very important overall in terms of quality of life. Unfortunately, the lack of randomised trials to validate conservative approaches does not guarantee the safety of fertility preservation strategies. However, evidence-based data from descriptive series suggest that in selected cases, the preservation of the uterus and at least one part of the ovary does not lead to a high risk of relapse. This conservative surgery helps to maintain organ function, giving patients of childbearing age the possibility to preserve their fertility. We hereby analysed the main evidence from the international literature on this topic in order to highlight the selected criteria for conservative management of OC patients, including healthy BRCA mutations carriers.Entities:
Keywords: fertility in cancer patients; fertility preservation; ovarian cancer; ovarian cancer survivors
Year: 2018 PMID: 30679952 PMCID: PMC6345054 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecancermedicalscience ISSN: 1754-6605
BOTs and fertility.
| Study | Patients | Stage | Pregnancies | Patients who conceived | Patients who attempted | Conception rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morris | 43 | IA–II | 25 | 12 | 24 | 27.91 |
| Zanetta | 189 | IA–III | 41 | 44 | NR | 23.28 |
| Morice | 44 | IA–III | 17 | 14 | NR | 31.82 |
| Cameatte | 17 | II–III | 8 | 7 | 9 | 41.18 |
| Fauvet | 162 | IA–III | 30 | 21 | 65 | 12.96 |
| Park | 184 | IA–III | 33 | 27 | 31 | 14.67 |
| Uzan | 41 | II–III | 18 | 14 | NR | 34.15 |
NR = not reported
Granulosa cell tumours and fertility.
| Study | Patients | Stage | Pregnancies | Patients who conceived | Patients who attempted | Conception rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 74 | IA–IV | 16 | 19 | 20 | 25.68 |
| Zanetta | 138 | IA–IC | 55 | 28 | 32 | 20.29 |
| Tangir | 64 | IA–IV | 47 | 29 | 38 | 45.31 |
| Zanagnolo | 39 | IA–IC | 11 | 36 | NR | 92.31 |
| Nishio | 30 | IA–IV | 4 | 8 | 12 | 26.67 |
| Chan | 313 | IA–IV | NR | 29 | 38 | 9.27 |
NR = not reported
Epithelial OCs and fertility.
| Study | Patients | Stage | Pregnancies | Patients who conceived | Patients who attempted | Conception rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zanetta | 56 | IA–II | 17 | 20 | NR | 35.71 |
| Morice | 25 | IA–II | 3 | 4 | 4 | 16.00 |
| Schilder | 52 | IA–IC | 26 | 17 | 24 | 32.69 |
| Morice | 34 | IA–IC | 10 | 9 | NR | 26.47 |
| Anchezar | 18 | IA–IIIB | 7 | 6 | 7 | 33.33 |
| Schlaerth | 20 | IA, IC | 9 | 6 | NR | 30.00 |
| Park | 62 | IA–IIIC | 22 | 15 | 19 | 24.19 |
| Raspagliesi | 10 | IA–IC | 2 | 3 | 5 | 30.00 |
| Borgfeldt | 23 | IA, IC | 30 | 15 | NR | 65.22 |
NR = not reported
Uterus transplantation and outcomes.
| Pts | Age | Cause of uterus absence | Type of transplantation | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fageeh W | 1 | 26 | Post-partum haemorrhage | Allotransplantation from alive donor | Histerectomy for acute vascular thrombosis |
| Ozkan | 1 | 21 | Complete müllerian agenesis | Allotransplantation from a deceased donor | Pregnancy with early miscarriage |
| Brännström | 9 | 31.5 | – Eight MRKH | Allotransplantation from alive donor | – Seven uteri remain viable (with mild rejection in four patients reversed with corticosteroids)
|
| Brännström | 1 | 35 | MRKH | Allotransplantation from alive donor | One live birth |
MRKH = Mayer Rokitanscky Küster Hauser syndrome
Figure 1.Fertility sparing strategies in OC patients. RR = recurrence rate, FSF = fertility sparing surgery, RS = radical surgery.