PURPOSE: There are few studies of somatic and mental morbidity in epithelial ovarian cancer survivors (EOCSs). The aim of this controlled, cross-sectional study was to explore fatigue, quality of life (QOL), and somatic and mental morbidity in EOCSs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 287 EOCSs treated according to protocols at The Norwegian Radium Hospital between 1977 and 2003, 189 patients (66%) participated. Information was collected by a questionnaire containing demographic and morbidity items and self-rating scales. Internal comparisons of various subgroups of EOCSs were performed, and EOCSs were compared with age-adjusted controls from the general population. RESULTS: Minimal differences were observed relating to somatic and mental morbidity, fatigue, and QOL between EOCSs with and without relapse, long or short follow-up time, and prognostic index status. Chronic fatigue was found in 22% (95% CI, 16% to 28%), and only body image was significantly associated with chronic fatigue in multivariable analyses. EOCSs showed significantly more somatic and mental morbidity, somatic complaints, use of medications, and use of health care services than controls. The levels of anxiety and fatigue were also significantly higher in EOCSs than in controls, whereas the levels of depression and of several QOL dimensions were lower. The prevalence of chronic fatigue was 12% among controls. CONCLUSION: EOCSs had more somatic and mental morbidity, more fatigue, poorer QOL, and used more medication and health services than controls. Minimal differences were observed between various EOCS subgroups. Health care professionals should try to improve and be attentive to the health of EOCSs.
PURPOSE: There are few studies of somatic and mental morbidity in epithelial ovarian cancer survivors (EOCSs). The aim of this controlled, cross-sectional study was to explore fatigue, quality of life (QOL), and somatic and mental morbidity in EOCSs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 287 EOCSs treated according to protocols at The Norwegian Radium Hospital between 1977 and 2003, 189 patients (66%) participated. Information was collected by a questionnaire containing demographic and morbidity items and self-rating scales. Internal comparisons of various subgroups of EOCSs were performed, and EOCSs were compared with age-adjusted controls from the general population. RESULTS: Minimal differences were observed relating to somatic and mental morbidity, fatigue, and QOL between EOCSs with and without relapse, long or short follow-up time, and prognostic index status. Chronic fatigue was found in 22% (95% CI, 16% to 28%), and only body image was significantly associated with chronic fatigue in multivariable analyses. EOCSs showed significantly more somatic and mental morbidity, somatic complaints, use of medications, and use of health care services than controls. The levels of anxiety and fatigue were also significantly higher in EOCSs than in controls, whereas the levels of depression and of several QOL dimensions were lower. The prevalence of chronic fatigue was 12% among controls. CONCLUSION: EOCSs had more somatic and mental morbidity, more fatigue, poorer QOL, and used more medication and health services than controls. Minimal differences were observed between various EOCS subgroups. Health care professionals should try to improve and be attentive to the health of EOCSs.
Authors: Alv A Dahl; Saevar Berg Gudbergsson; Anne Dørum; Sophie D Fosså; Astrid H Liavaag; Øystein Sørebø Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Smita C Banerjee; Matthew J Matasar; Carma L Bylund; Steven Horwitz; Kara McLarney; Tomer Levin; Paul B Jacobsen; Patricia Parker; Alan Astrow; David W Kissane Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Michaela G Cuneo; Andrew Schrepf; George M Slavich; Premal H Thaker; Michael Goodheart; David Bender; Steve W Cole; Anil K Sood; Susan K Lutgendorf Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Fay J Hlubocky; Christopher K Daugherty; Jeffery Peppercorn; Karen Young; Kristen E Wroblewski; Seiko Diane Yamada; Nita K Lee Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2022-08
Authors: Christelle Schofield; Robert U Newton; Paul A Cohen; Daniel A Galvão; Joanne A McVeigh; Ganendra R Mohan; Jason Tan; Stuart G Salfinger; Leon M Straker; Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyre Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Vivian E von Gruenigen; Helen Q Huang; Karen M Gil; Heidi E Gibbons; Bradley J Monk; Peter G Rose; Deborah K Armstrong; David Cella; Lari Wenzel Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Roger T Anderson; Lauren C Peres; Fabian Camacho; Elisa V Bandera; Ellen Funkhouser; Patricia G Moorman; Lisa E Paddock; Edward S Peters; Sarah E Abbott; Anthony J Alberg; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa Bondy; Michele L Cote; Ann G Schwartz; Paul Terry; Joellen M Schildkraut Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 2.681