Lauren C Peres1, Kara L Cushing-Haugen2, Martin Köbel3, Holly R Harris2, Andrew Berchuck4, Mary Anne Rossing2, Joellen M Schildkraut1, Jennifer A Doherty2,5. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. 2. Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 5. Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Abstract
Background: The understanding of ovarian cancer pathogenesis has recently shifted to recognize distinct changes in how ovarian cancer histotypes are defined. Using the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic guidelines, we classified ovarian cancer histotypes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data and examined survival patterns by histotype and disease stage. Methods: We extracted data on 28 118 incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 2004-2014 from SEER and defined histotype using the 2014 WHO guidelines (high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, carcinosarcoma, and malignant Brenner tumors). By histotype and disease stage, we estimated Kaplan-Meier survival curves and calculated age-adjusted overall and cause-specific survival estimates. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate histotype-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by disease stage while adjusting for age at diagnosis, region, race/ethnicity, and receipt of surgery. Results: Within two years after diagnosis, localized/regional-stage carcinosarcoma and distant-stage mucinous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma had a higher risk of mortality compared with high-grade serous, with the most pronounced association for localized/regional carcinosarcoma (>1-2-year time period: HR = 3.81, 95% CI = 2.74 to 5.30) and distant-stage mucinous (0-1-year time period: HR = 3.87, 95% CI = 3.45 to 4.34). In the time period more than four to 10 years after diagnosis, hazard ratios for all histotypes relative to high-grade serous, irrespective of disease stage, were less than 1.00. Cumulatively, both localized/regional and distant-stage low-grade serous and endometrioid carcinomas had the most favorable outcomes. Conclusions: Our large study, which is representative of the United States population and incorporates the most current knowledge of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, highlights the need to recognize ovarian cancer as a set of distinct diseases and not a single entity. Only then will we be able to effectively target the unique features of each histotype to reduce ovarian cancer mortality.
Background: The understanding of ovarian cancer pathogenesis has recently shifted to recognize distinct changes in how ovarian cancer histotypes are defined. Using the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic guidelines, we classified ovarian cancer histotypes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data and examined survival patterns by histotype and disease stage. Methods: We extracted data on 28 118 incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 2004-2014 from SEER and defined histotype using the 2014 WHO guidelines (high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, carcinosarcoma, and malignant Brenner tumors). By histotype and disease stage, we estimated Kaplan-Meier survival curves and calculated age-adjusted overall and cause-specific survival estimates. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate histotype-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by disease stage while adjusting for age at diagnosis, region, race/ethnicity, and receipt of surgery. Results: Within two years after diagnosis, localized/regional-stage carcinosarcoma and distant-stage mucinous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma had a higher risk of mortality compared with high-grade serous, with the most pronounced association for localized/regional carcinosarcoma (>1-2-year time period: HR = 3.81, 95% CI = 2.74 to 5.30) and distant-stage mucinous (0-1-year time period: HR = 3.87, 95% CI = 3.45 to 4.34). In the time period more than four to 10 years after diagnosis, hazard ratios for all histotypes relative to high-grade serous, irrespective of disease stage, were less than 1.00. Cumulatively, both localized/regional and distant-stage low-grade serous and endometrioid carcinomas had the most favorable outcomes. Conclusions: Our large study, which is representative of the United States population and incorporates the most current knowledge of ovarian cancer pathogenesis, highlights the need to recognize ovarian cancer as a set of distinct diseases and not a single entity. Only then will we be able to effectively target the unique features of each histotype to reduce ovarian cancer mortality.
Authors: J Engel; R Eckel; G Schubert-Fritschle; J Kerr; W Kuhn; J Diebold; R Kimmig; J Rehbock; D Hölzel Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: J I Akahira; H Yoshikawa; Y Shimizu; R Tsunematsu; T Hirakawa; H Kuramoto; K Shiromizu; K Kuzuya; T Kamura; Y Kikuchi; S Kodama; K Yamamoto; S Sato Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Robert E Bristow; Rafael S Tomacruz; Deborah K Armstrong; Edward L Trimble; F J Montz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Viviane Hess; Roger A'Hern; Nazar Nasiri; D Michael King; Peter R Blake; Desmond P J Barton; John H Shepherd; T Ind; J Bridges; K Harrington; Stanley B Kaye; Martin E Gore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Ann G Schwartz; Faisal Qureshi; Suzanne Jacques; John Malone; Adnan R Munkarah Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Olga Kim; Eun Young Park; Sun Young Kwon; Sojin Shin; Robert E Emerson; Yong-Hyun Shin; Francesco J DeMayo; John P Lydon; Donna M Coffey; Shannon M Hawkins; Lawrence A Quilliam; Dong-Joo Cheon; Facundo M Fernández; Kenneth P Nephew; Adam R Karpf; Martin Widschwendter; Anil K Sood; Robert C Bast; Andrew K Godwin; Kathy D Miller; Chi-Heum Cho; Jaeyeon Kim Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joellen M Schildkraut; Lauren C Peres; Traci N Bethea; Fabian Camacho; Deanna Chyn; Emily K Cloyd; Elisa V Bandera; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Loren Lipworth; Charlotte E Joslin; Faith G Davis; Patricia G Moorman; Evan Myers; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Malcolm C Pike; Anna H Wu; Lynn Rosenberg Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: He An; Yiang Wang; Esther M F Wong; Shanshan Lyu; Lujun Han; Jose A U Perucho; Peng Cao; Elaine Y P Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lauren C Peres; James R Hebert; Bo Qin; Kristin A Guertin; Elisa V Bandera; Nitin Shivappa; Tareq F Camacho; Deanna Chyn; Anthony J Alberg; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa L Bondy; Michele L Cote; Ellen Funkhouser; Patricia G Moorman; Edward S Peters; Ann G Schwartz; Paul D Terry; Joellen M Schildkraut Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Shelley S Tworoger; Holly R Harris; Garnet L Anderson; Clarice R Weinberg; Britton Trabert; Andrew M Kaunitz; Aimee A D'Aloisio; Dale P Sandler; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lauren C Peres; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Michael Anglesio; Kristine Wicklund; Rex Bentley; Andrew Berchuck; Linda E Kelemen; Tayyebeh M Nazeran; C Blake Gilks; Holly R Harris; David G Huntsman; Joellen M Schildkraut; Mary Anne Rossing; Martin Köbel; Jennifer A Doherty Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 5.482