Literature DB >> 19191075

Improvement of survival in sex cord stromal tumors - an observational study with more than 25 years follow-up.

Gabriele Hölscher1, Christoph Anthuber, Gunther Bastert, Alexander Burges, Doris Mayr, Ernst Oberlechner, Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle, Sonja Sinz, Harald Sommer, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Jutta Engel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To highlight aspects of malignant ovarian sex cord stromal tumors, effects of treatment, and developments over the past 28 years.
DESIGN: Population-based cohort study.
SETTING: Gynecological departments within the catchment-area of the Munich Cancer Registry and associated with the project group 'Malignant Ovarian Tumors' of the Munich Cancer Center. SAMPLE: One hundred and forty-five women with an invasive single sex cord stromal tumor diagnosed between 1978 and 2005.
METHODS: Overall survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, relative survival was computed by the ratio of observed to expected survival rate. The impact of age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)-stage, residual tumor, and chemotherapy was examined by multivariate analysis (Cox regression model). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall and relative survival and multivariate adjusted overall survival.
RESULTS: Survival data showed a five-/10-year overall survival of 55.8%/42.8% (relative survival 58.6%/49.2%) for women diagnosed before 1988 and 89.1%/78.3% (relative survival 92.7%/85.2%) for women diagnosed after 1988. After adjustment for age and FIGO-stage, the following hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for treatment methods resulted: 3.3 (95% CI 1.5-7.0) for women with compared to women without residual tumor and 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-4.2) for women with chemotherapy compared to women where no chemotherapy was given.
CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in survival may be attributed to a stage-shift toward more favorable stages at diagnosis and to advances in treatment such as improved surgery without residual tumor. There is no evidence for any benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment, yet the benefit of postoperative therapy is still under debate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19191075     DOI: 10.1080/00016340902741208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  3 in total

1.  Population-based study of ovarian cancer in Côte d'Or: prognostic factors and trends in relative survival rates over the last 20 years.

Authors:  Zeinab Hamidou; Sylvain Causeret; Tienhan S Dabakuyo; Julie Gentil; Laurent Arnould; Patrick Roignot; Thierry Altwegg; Marie-Laure Poillot; Franck Bonnetain; Patrick Arveux
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  The histology of ovarian cancer: worldwide distribution and implications for international survival comparisons (CONCORD-2).

Authors:  Melissa Matz; Michel P Coleman; Milena Sant; Maria Dolores Chirlaque; Otto Visser; Martin Gore; Claudia Allemani
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Fertility preservation in ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Federica Tomao; Anna Di Pinto; Carolina Maria Sassu; Erlisa Bardhi; Violante Di Donato; Ludovico Muzii; Maria Cristina Petrella; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-12-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.